ArticlePloS one2025
Assessment of clinical medical education needs inform design of a preceptor development program in Jordan: A multi method study.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
26 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundClinical preceptors serve as vital educators, so it is essential to enhance their effectiveness by developing a competency-based development program. In this study, we explored the challenges faced by preceptors and students, and measured the educational needs of preceptors, to inform the design of a syllabus for a preceptor development program.
methodsThis was a sequential multi method study utilizing a structured questionnaire survey and focus group discussions among a representative sample of medical students in their fourth, fifth, and sixth years in addition to preceptors from the six public medical schools in Jordan.
resultsThematic analysis of focus group discussions revealed six themes: admission policy, training environment, curriculum gaps, trainers and mentorship, learners, and dissemination. The most important training needs documented by preceptors were teaching in the clinical setting, mentoring skills, simulation, assessment in the clinical setting, and providing feedback. Accordingly, a competency-based preliminary syllabus was developed.
conclusionIt is essential to enrich the skills of preceptors regularly based on a needs assessment. Further long term studies are required to investigate the effectiveness of the proposed syllabus after implementation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.