Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41259316›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) in fish collected from the Rio Grande and reservoirs in northern New Mexico.

Justin Clements, Jenna Stanek, Cyler Conrad, Jessica Celmer, Hanna Mora, Zachary Jones, Kylie Gallegos, Chauncey Gadek, Shannon Gaukler

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Justin ClementsEnvironmental Protection and Compliance Division, Environmental Stewardship Group, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, New Mexico, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5482-7984
Jenna StanekEnvironmental Protection and Compliance Division, Environmental Stewardship Group, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, New Mexico, United States of America.
Cyler ConradEarth Systems Science Division, Risk and Environmental Assessment Group, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, Washington, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4659-2884
Jessica CelmerEnvironmental Protection and Compliance Division, Environmental Stewardship Group, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, New Mexico, United States of America.
Hanna MoraEnvironmental Protection and Compliance Division, Environmental Stewardship Group, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, New Mexico, United States of America.
Zachary JonesEnvironmental Protection and Compliance Division, Environmental Stewardship Group, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, New Mexico, United States of America.
Kylie GallegosEnvironmental Protection and Compliance Division, Environmental Stewardship Group, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, New Mexico, United States of America.
Chauncey GadekEnvironmental Protection and Compliance Division, Environmental Stewardship Group, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, New Mexico, United States of America.
Shannon GauklerEnvironmental Protection and Compliance Division, Environmental Stewardship Group, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, New Mexico, United States of America.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) are a group of industrial and commercial chemicals widely used throughout the world due to their beneficial chemical properties. Because of their widespread use, their chemical stability, and their ability to be transported over long distances through atmospheric deposition and movement through waterways, PFAS are found throughout most aquatic ecosystems; yet large sampling gaps exist among reservoir and river ecosystems in the desert southwest of the United States. In this study, we examine PFAS concentrations in the tissue of fish (catfish [channel and blue], common carp, smallmouth bass, northern pike, walleye, white crappie and white sucker) collected in northern New Mexico, including examining PFAS composition and concentration relative to trophic level distribution. We collected fish from two man-made reservoirs and from the Rio Grande. We then collected muscle and liver tissues from fish specimens, which were screened for 39 PFAS compounds. We detected PFAS compounds in most fish tissue sampled, including the biomagnification of PFAS compounds within liver samples, with PFOS concentrations ranged from 1.13 to 350.1 (64.4 average) times higher in the liver samples compared to muscle samples. Most PFAS concentrations within muscle samples were within the range of atmospheric transportation previously reported and average tissue concentrations of PFAS were calculated to be 2.02 ± 1.81 ng g-1. Using stable isotopes as a predictor of trophic-foraging exposure and PFAS concentrations, we noted a correlation between enriched δ15N values, which had higher perfluorodecanoic acid concentrations.

Indexed as

FishesFluorocarbonsWater Pollutants, ChemicalAnimalsEnvironmental MonitoringLiverMusclesNew MexicoRiversFluorocarbonsWater Pollutants, Chemical

Identifiers

PMID41259316
PMCPMC12629422

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.