Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41259310›Full record

ArticleCBE life sciences education2025

Navigating the Culture of Biology: Comparing Latinas' Experience with Asian and Black Undergraduate Women at an MSI.

Maria G Rendon, Glenda M Flores, David R Schaefer

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in CBE life sciences education, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Maria G RendonDepartment of Urban Planning and Public Policy, University of California, Irvine, CA 92697.
Glenda M FloresDepartment of Chicano/Latino Studies, University of California, Irvine, CA 92697.
David R SchaeferDepartment of Sociology, University of California, Irvine, CA 92697.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Women in science, technology, engineering and mathermatics (STEM) point to a competitive, predominantly white, male-dominant STEM culture where women confront a "chilly climate" and microaggressions. This includes biology, where there is gender parity, but underrepresented minority (URM) disparities prevail. We draw on qualitative data-focus groups, in-depth interviews, and journal entries-to compare the experiences of Latina, self-identified Black, and Asian American women in a biology undergraduate program at a prestigious Minority Serving Institution. We find that all women identify a competitive culture in biology, but differed in how they interpreted and navigated the major. Class-diverse Asian American women and white presenting, middle-class Latinas interpreted STEM culture through a meritocratic, colorblind lens, reflecting their seamless academic and social integration. In contrast, first-generation college-going, working-class Latinas and Black women, who were middle class in this study, interpreted the biology classroom culture through a class and racial lens. Working-class Latinas, in particular, experienced academic culture shock and, like Black women, had racialized interactions, reported being rebuffed when interacting and attempting to collaborate with predominantly Asian peers. URM women, including at MSIs, experience a competitive, non-collaborative culture in biology, with working-class Latinas culturally sidelined and, like Black women, racialized negatively in the major.

Indexed as

AsianBiologyBlack or African AmericanCultureHispanic or LatinoStudentsFemaleFocus GroupsHumansUniversities

Identifiers

PMID41259310
PMCPMC12667361

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.