SynthesisAesthetic surgery journal2026
Optimizing Autologous Fat Grafting: A Systematic Review of Enhancement Strategies and Graft Survival.
Synthesis in Aesthetic surgery journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Radiological Findings Post Autologous Fat Grafting and Breasts Procedures: Avoiding False Positive Results.ANZ journal of surgery · 2026Review
- Essentials for optimizing outcomes in oncoplastic breast reconstruction.Gland surgery · 2026Review
- Article
- Combined Stromal Vascular Fraction and HGF-Functionalized Self-Assembling Peptide Hydrogel Improves Intracerebral Hemorrhage Repair in Rats.Gels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Advancing fat graft survival: from adipose-derived stem cell mechanisms to next-generation regenerative strategies.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Autologous fat grafting has become an important tool in reconstructive and aesthetic surgery, particularly for breast reconstruction and soft tissue augmentation. Despite its promise, long-term outcomes remain unpredictable. To address this, research has increasingly focused on optimizing graft survival by enriching the lipoaspirate with additional substances. A systematic search of PubMed (National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD) and Web of Science (Clarivate, Philadelphia, PA) identified studies on enhancement methods of autologous fat grafting in both animal models and clinical settings, published up to February 2025. In vitro trials, case reports, and studies comparing techniques without specific enhancement of the lipoaspirate were excluded. Twenty-seven studies fulfilled the criteria, including 15 animal studies and 12 clinical studies, most of which investigated applications in breast reconstruction and augmentation. The included studies showed substantial heterogeneity in enhancement strategies, case numbers, follow-up duration, and outcome measures. The most frequently examined approaches involved enrichment with stromal vascular fraction (SVF) and/or adipose-derived stem cells (ADSCs). Both methods demonstrated favourable results in many trials, though statistical significance was not always achieved. Other strategies included the use of Vitamin D3, Botulinum toxin A, platelet-rich plasma (PRP), and less frequently studied agents such as N-acetylcysteine and Salvia miltiorrhiza. Overall, enrichment of lipoaspirate appears to enhance graft survival, with SVF/ADSC-based methods and PRP emerging as the most promising approaches. Nevertheless, marked variability in protocols and outcome measures hampers comparability between studies. Larger randomized controlled trials employing standardized methodologies are essential to confirm clinical feasibility and provide a basis for evidence-based guidelines. Level of Evidence: 3 (Therapeutic) For image description, please refer to the figure legend and surrounding text.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.