Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41259235›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in obstetrics & gynecology2026

Endometrial cancer therapy in 2026.

Victoria E Rodriguez, Miles Morrow, Rajeshree Rajpara, Dana M Chase

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in obstetrics & gynecology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Victoria E RodriguezDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles.
Miles MorrowUniversity of California, Santa Cruz.
Rajeshree RajparaUniversity of California, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Dana M ChaseDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles.

Funding

Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Training in Urologic and Gynecologic Cancers (PCORT UroGynCan)T32CA251072 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI Beth Y. Karlan, MARK S. LITWIN · 2020 to 2026
$2.1M
NCI NIH HHS T32 CA251072
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewEndometrial cancer is one of the few cancers that has continued to rise in incidence over the past decade, necessitating novel diagnostic and treatment approaches. RECENT

findingsA revised staging system for endometrial cancer has been implemented in the last 5 years as growing attention has also been directed toward identifying biomarkers and other factors that offer deeper insights into tumor biology and therapeutic responses. Fertility-preserving therapy can be an option for younger patients when certain criteria are met. The use of immunotherapy for advanced stages (III or IV) or recurrent endometrial cancer has been studied extensively over the last 5 years, with new treatment options including checkpoint inhibitors. Recurrent cases have a particularly poor prognosis, and there have been limited options for patients. New treatments have been approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for recurrent endometrial cancer, leading to improved outcomes for patients. SUMMARY: There have been improvements in endometrial cancer therapy, leading to increased survival and improved outcomes; however, there are unmet needs that need to be addressed in 2026 and beyond.

Indexed as

Endometrial NeoplasmsFertility PreservationImmunotherapyNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalFemaleHumansImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsNeoplasm StagingPrognosisImmune Checkpoint Inhibitorsendometrial cancertherapeutic approachestreatment advances

Identifiers

PMID41259235
PMCPMC13292800

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.