ReviewCurrent opinion in obstetrics & gynecology2026
Endometrial cancer therapy in 2026.
Review in Current opinion in obstetrics & gynecology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purpose of reviewEndometrial cancer is one of the few cancers that has continued to rise in incidence over the past decade, necessitating novel diagnostic and treatment approaches. RECENT
findingsA revised staging system for endometrial cancer has been implemented in the last 5 years as growing attention has also been directed toward identifying biomarkers and other factors that offer deeper insights into tumor biology and therapeutic responses. Fertility-preserving therapy can be an option for younger patients when certain criteria are met. The use of immunotherapy for advanced stages (III or IV) or recurrent endometrial cancer has been studied extensively over the last 5 years, with new treatment options including checkpoint inhibitors. Recurrent cases have a particularly poor prognosis, and there have been limited options for patients. New treatments have been approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for recurrent endometrial cancer, leading to improved outcomes for patients. SUMMARY: There have been improvements in endometrial cancer therapy, leading to increased survival and improved outcomes; however, there are unmet needs that need to be addressed in 2026 and beyond.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.