Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41259234›Full record

ArticleJournal of radiation research2026

Development and validation of an in vivo pain assessment method for 28-day exposure to intermediate frequency magnetic fields.

Shin Ohtani, Akira Ushiyama, Keiji Wada, Masateru Ikehata, Yukihisa Suzuki, Kenji Hattori

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of radiation research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Shin OhtaniLaboratory of Environmental Toxicology, Meiji Pharmaceutical University, 2-522-1 Noshio, Kiyose, Tokyo 204-8588, Japan.
Akira UshiyamaDepartment of Environmental Health, National Institute of Public Health, 2-3-6 Minami, Wako, Saitama 351-0197, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-2415-1324
Keiji WadaGraduate School of Systems Design, Tokyo Metropolitan University, 6-6 Asahigaoka, Hino, Tokyo, 191-0065, Japan.
Masateru IkehataComfort Science and Engineering Laboratory, Human Science Division, Railway Technical Research Institute, 2-8-38 Hikari, Kokubunji, Tokyo, 185-8540, Japan.
Yukihisa SuzukiGraduate School of Systems Design, Tokyo Metropolitan University, 6-6 Asahigaoka, Hino, Tokyo, 191-0065, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-5824-070X
Kenji HattoriLaboratory of Environmental Toxicology, Meiji Pharmaceutical University, 2-522-1 Noshio, Kiyose, Tokyo 204-8588, Japan.

Funding

Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications JPMI 10001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The objective of this study was to establish guidelines for evaluating the health effects of electromagnetic fields (EMFs). To achieve this, a comprehensive evaluation of EMF effects on living organisms from both engineering and biological perspectives is essential. As part of this study, we examined the impact of intermediate-frequency magnetic fields (IF-MF) exposure on peripheral nerves in mice and validated the reliability of five pain assessment methods. The engineering approach was based on our pilot study, while the biological approach involved exposing mice to IF-MF for a 28-day period and assessing neurotoxicity through the implementation of five pain tests. The von Frey test, conducted with a Dynamic Plantar Aesthesiometer, was performed at various time points during exposure. The results indicated that leg withdrawal time was shortened only in the positive control group. After conducting a series of assessments, we demonstrated that no statistically significant differences were observed among the IF-MF-exposed, sham-exposed and control groups. However, the positive control group exhibited significant variations in the four supplemental assessments. No significant differences were detected in the other three groups. These findings suggest that subacute (28-day) IF-MF exposure at 2.3 times the basic restriction for occupational exposure according to International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection guideline does not result in peripheral neurotoxicity and that the utilized pain assessment methods used for IF-MF exposure are effective.

Indexed as

Electromagnetic FieldsMagnetic FieldsPainPain MeasurementAnimalsMaleMiceReproducibility of ResultsTime Factorsexposure assessmentintermediate-frequency electromagnetic fields (IF-MF)neurotoxicity assessmentpain evaluation methods

Identifiers

PMID41259234
PMCPMC12856025

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.