ArticleJournal of the National Cancer Institute2026
Tattoos and risk of cutaneous melanoma and nonmelanoma skin cancer in France.
Article in Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Is tattooing associated with an increased risk of cancer? A systematic review and meta-analysis.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026Review
- Tattoo practices and risk of hepatitis B and hepatitis C infection in the French Constances study.International journal of infectious diseases : IJID : official publication of the International Society for Infectious Diseases · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundWith the increasing popularity of decorative tattooing, which entails the intradermal injection of inks that may contain carcinogens, investigating the related potential skin cancer risk is a public health priority.
methodsWe used data from the Cancer Risk Attributable with the Body Art of Tattooing study, nested in the French national cohort Consultants des Centres d'Examens de Santé (adults aged 18-69 years recruited in 2012-2018). Tattoo exposure was collected in 2020-2023. Skin cancers overall, cutaneous melanoma, and nonmelanoma skin cancer diagnosed during 2007-2021 were retrieved from national health insurance data. As exposure was collected after possible disease ascertainment, risks of skin cancer with prior tattoo exposure were assessed using logistic regression and Cox proportional hazards models in a retrospective cohort design.
resultsAmong 111 074 participants, 1789 (1.6%) skin cancers were recorded (693 cutaneous melanoma, 1096 nonmelanoma skin cancer). No association was found between binary tattoo exposure (yes, no) and any skin cancer type. In the highest exposure category of tattoo body surface (>2 hand palms), 2 participants with skin cancer were observed among 1633 (0.1%) participants, yielding an odds ratio of 0.21 for overall skin cancer (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.05 to 0.83; reference no tattoos); however, the corresponding Cox model was not statistically significant (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.26, 95% CI = 0.07 to 1.05).
conclusionsNo overall association between tattoo exposure and skin cancer was observed. The inverse association in the highest exposure category is based on very few skin cancer diagnoses and should be interpreted with caution. Further studies with larger number of participants with skin cancer more detailed exposure assessment are warranted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.