Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41259038›Full record

ArticleJournal of animal science2025

Residual methane emission determination and classification of growing steers during the backgrounding and finishing phases.

Juan de J Vargas, Marisa Werner, Maya Swenson, Leonardo Sitorski, Eduardo M Paula, Diego Manriquez, Pedro H V Carvalho, Sara E Place

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of animal science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Juan de J VargasAgNext, Department of Animal Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523.ORCID 0000-0002-7674-3850
Marisa WernerAgNext, Department of Animal Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523.
Maya SwensonAgNext, Department of Animal Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523.
Leonardo SitorskiAgNext, Department of Animal Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523.
Eduardo M PaulaAgNext, Department of Animal Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523.ORCID 0000-0002-1891-6303
Diego ManriquezAgNext, Department of Animal Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523.
Pedro H V CarvalhoAgNext, Department of Animal Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523.ORCID 0000-0003-1620-6831
Sara E PlaceAgNext, Department of Animal Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523.ORCID 0000-0002-4033-3681

Funding

US Department of Agriculture Natural Resources Conservation Service Conservation Innovation NR233A750011G020
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aimed to assess the relationship between animal growth performance and gas flux variables in predicting methane (CH4) emissions, and to determine the consistency of residual CH4 emission (RME) classification in growing steers during the backgrounding and finishing phases. A total of 83 Angus steers (approximately 8 mo of age and 200 ± 27.9 kg of initial body weight [BW]) were enrolled during the backgrounding phase. During the finishing phase, 36 steers did not receive a growth-promoting implant, while 47 steers were implanted with a growth-promoting implant. Individual animal growth performance, dry matter intake, and gas flux (CH4 and carbon dioxide [CO2] production and oxygen [O2] consumption) were determined in both phases. The relationship between observed CH4 emission, animal growth performance, and gas flux variables was evaluated using regression analysis. Residual methane emissions was determined using metabolic BW and dry matter intake (i.e., RME_MD) and CO2 production (i.e., RME_CO2) as regressors for estimating CH4 production. Steers were ranked in ascending order according to their RME_MD and RME_CO2. Then, steers were classified as low, medium, and high emitters based on the quartile distribution. Gas flux and animal growth performance were then analyzed using a completely randomized design for each phase. The relationship between RME classification during backgrounding and the subsequent classification during finishing was analyzed using regression and Fisher's exact tests. Animal growth performance explained between 26% and 50% of the CH4 production, while CO2 production and O2 consumption explained between 47% and 90% of CH4 production during the backgrounding and finishing phases, respectively. When transitioning from backgrounding to a finishing phase, 38% of the steers maintained their initial classification. Steers divergently classified according to RME_MD or RME_CO2 did not differ (P > 0.10) in growth performance during either backgrounding or finishing phases. However, steers with low RME had lower (P ≤ 0.001) CH4 production than those classified as high RME. In conclusion, RME_MD and RME_CO2 identified growing steers with lower CH4 emissions without affecting animal growth performance during the backgrounding and finishing phases. However, RME classification should be conducted in each phase because growing steers were re-ranked by 62% when changing from the backgrounding to the finishing phase.

Indexed as

MethaneAnimal FeedAnimalsCarbon DioxideCattleMaleCarbon DioxideMethanecarbon dioxidegas fluxgrowing steersoxygen

Identifiers

PMID41259038
PMCPMC12681053

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.