Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41259019›Full record

ArticleJAMA surgery2026

Financial Hardship After Surgical Procedures.

Alexandra Hernandez, Nina M Clark, Jamie Olapo, Charles Liu, Rhea Udyavar, Jonathan G Sham, Ali Rowhani-Rahbar, Joseph L Dieleman, John W Scott

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Pain severity and opioid use in patients with spine-related diagnoses.Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Alexandra HernandezDepartment of Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle.
Nina M ClarkDepartment of Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle.
Jamie OlapoDepartment of Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle.
Charles LiuDepartment of Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle.
Rhea UdyavarDepartment of Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle.
Jonathan G ShamDepartment of Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle.
Ali Rowhani-RahbarDepartment of Epidemiology, University of Washington, Seattle.
Joseph L DielemanInstitute for Health Metrics and Evaluation, University of Washington, Seattle.
John W ScottInstitute for Health Metrics and Evaluation, University of Washington, Seattle.

Funding

Renewal: Gastrointestinal Surgery Outcomes Research FellowshipT32DK070555 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI FLUM, DAVID R · 2010 to 2024
$3.6M
Insurance Coverage and Workforce Incentives to Improve Access to Surgical CareR01DK137466 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI Andrew Mounir Ibrahim, Jonathan William Scott · 2023 to 2026
$1.5M
AHRQ HHS K08 HS028672NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK137466NIDDK NIH HHS T32 DK070555
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Affordable access to surgical procedures remains elusive for many in the US. However, the financial hardship attributable to surgical procedures is not well understood at the national level. Objective: To evaluate the association between surgical procedures and financial hardship among working-aged adults in the US, compare changes in financial hardship after elective vs emergency surgery, and examine variation by payer and income. Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective cohort study of the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS) included respondents from 2014 to 2021. The MEPS is a nationally representative survey of noninstitutionalized US civilians. All adults aged 18 to 64 years old who reported undergoing a surgical procedure were matched to a cohort of nonsurgical control patients using coarsened exact matching on age, sex, race, ethnicity, income, payer, census region, comorbidities, and year. These data were analyzed from January 2025 to August 2025. Exposures: The primary exposure was surgical procedure(s) within the last 12 months; secondary exposure was emergency vs elective surgical procedures. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome of interest was financial hardship, defined as problems paying medical bills or delaying needed care due to cost. Secondary outcome was family out-of-pocket (OOP) spending. Results: The weighted sample included 40 million working-aged (18-64 years) adults (62% female and 38% male) who underwent surgical procedures. Overall, 37.9% of surgical patients experienced financial hardship in the year after surgery. On difference-in-differences analysis, surgical procedures were associated with a 5.4-percentage point increase (95% CI, 1.8-9.0) in financial hardship, a 16% relative increase. Uninsured patients had a 23.7-percentage point increase (95% CI, 5.1-42.2), privately insured patients had an 8.4-percentage point increase (95% CI, 3.6-13.1), and those with Medicaid had no significant change. OOP spending increased by $708 (95% CI, $576-$839) after operations, with the highest increases among emergency surgeries and non-Medicaid insurance type. Conclusions and Relevance: Surgical procedures were associated with substantial financial hardship for working-aged adults in the US, especially after emergency surgery and among the uninsured and privately insured. The finding that Medicaid enrollees were protected against increases in financial hardship after surgical procedures suggests that policies that restrict Medicaid eligibility may increase financial hardship among working-aged surgical patients, unless other changes are made to improve financial risk protection.

Indexed as

Elective Surgical ProceduresFinancial StressHealth ExpendituresSurgical Procedures, OperativeAdolescentAdultFemaleHumansIncomeMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesUnited StatesYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID41259019
PMCPMC12631565

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.