ArticleJAMA surgery2026
Financial Hardship After Surgical Procedures.
Article in JAMA surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Age, Financial Hardship, and Catastrophic Health Expenditure After Emergency Surgery.The Journal of surgical research · 2026Article
- Association of intraoperative dexamethasone administration with postoperative delirium and the role of hyperglycaemia: a retrospective cohort study.EClinicalMedicine · 2026Article
- Epidemiological analysis and comparison of 259 extensive burn patients from 2010 to 2021: Evidence for autonomous medical team.PloS one · 2026Article
- Pain severity and opioid use in patients with spine-related diagnoses.Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Importance: Affordable access to surgical procedures remains elusive for many in the US. However, the financial hardship attributable to surgical procedures is not well understood at the national level. Objective: To evaluate the association between surgical procedures and financial hardship among working-aged adults in the US, compare changes in financial hardship after elective vs emergency surgery, and examine variation by payer and income. Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective cohort study of the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS) included respondents from 2014 to 2021. The MEPS is a nationally representative survey of noninstitutionalized US civilians. All adults aged 18 to 64 years old who reported undergoing a surgical procedure were matched to a cohort of nonsurgical control patients using coarsened exact matching on age, sex, race, ethnicity, income, payer, census region, comorbidities, and year. These data were analyzed from January 2025 to August 2025. Exposures: The primary exposure was surgical procedure(s) within the last 12 months; secondary exposure was emergency vs elective surgical procedures. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome of interest was financial hardship, defined as problems paying medical bills or delaying needed care due to cost. Secondary outcome was family out-of-pocket (OOP) spending. Results: The weighted sample included 40 million working-aged (18-64 years) adults (62% female and 38% male) who underwent surgical procedures. Overall, 37.9% of surgical patients experienced financial hardship in the year after surgery. On difference-in-differences analysis, surgical procedures were associated with a 5.4-percentage point increase (95% CI, 1.8-9.0) in financial hardship, a 16% relative increase. Uninsured patients had a 23.7-percentage point increase (95% CI, 5.1-42.2), privately insured patients had an 8.4-percentage point increase (95% CI, 3.6-13.1), and those with Medicaid had no significant change. OOP spending increased by $708 (95% CI, $576-$839) after operations, with the highest increases among emergency surgeries and non-Medicaid insurance type. Conclusions and Relevance: Surgical procedures were associated with substantial financial hardship for working-aged adults in the US, especially after emergency surgery and among the uninsured and privately insured. The finding that Medicaid enrollees were protected against increases in financial hardship after surgical procedures suggests that policies that restrict Medicaid eligibility may increase financial hardship among working-aged surgical patients, unless other changes are made to improve financial risk protection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.