ReviewInternational urology and nephrology2026
Penile cancer and lymph node management: a call for standardization.
Review in International urology and nephrology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Initial experience and technical description of robot-assisted single-port laparoscopic bilateral inguinal lymph node dissection for penile cancer: a report of two cases.Translational andrology and urology · 2026Article
- Predicting inguinal lymph node metastasis in penile squamous cell carcinoma, from imaging, molecular biomarkers to multimodal AI: a narrative review.Translational andrology and urology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
22 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThis study aims to compare and organize recommendations from the most eminent international guidelines on the staging and treatment of lymph node (LN) involvement in penile cancer (PC). Early recognition and appropriate management of nodal disease remain the cornerstone of care, influencing both survival and treatment-related morbidity.
methodsThis study compares and organize recommendations form the most eminent international guidelines-including NCCN, ESMO-EURACAN, and EAU-ASCO-on the staging and treatment of lymph node involvement in penile cancer.
resultsOpen inguinal LN dissection (ILND) remains the standard treatment for not superficial cancers and its morbidity has driven interest in minimally invasive surgical approaches, such as video-endoscopic inguinal lymphadenectomy (VEIL), including its robot-assisted variant (RA-VEIL). Their role is well defined in clinically node-negative (cN0) patients but remains investigational in node-positive (cN+) cases. For cN3 disease and pelvic node involvement, multimodal strategies including chemotherapy, surgery, and radiotherapy are required.
conclusionThe variability among guidelines underscores the need for collaborative efforts and high-quality prospective trials to refine and standardize treatment recommendations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.