ArticleJournal of neurology2025
Assessment of IBM-FRS total score and specific functional domains in a large cohort of inclusion body myositis patients.
Article in Journal of neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
38 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Inclusion body myositis (IBM) is an acquired myopathy of older adults, associated with progressive weakness and functional limitations. The inclusion body myositis functional rating score (IBM-FRS) is a reliable tool for the assessment of disease severity, but poor data are available on its correlation with clinical features. In this cross-sectional, retrospective multicenter study, we analyzed IBM-FRS total score (TS) and its items in a cohort of 147 IBM patients, considering 4 functional domains (FD) (dysphagia, upper limb function, daily living and independence, lower limb function). We analyzed TS and FD values' correlations with demographic and clinical variables (onset, loss of walking ability, non-invasive ventilation, percutaneous gastrostomy-PEG) as well as between each FD and the remaining TS. Lower, hence worse, scores in the dysphagia domain (FD1) correlated with female gender (p < 0.01), dysphagia as presenting symptom (p < 0.01), and PEG use (p < 0.0001), but interestingly without correlation with time variables IBM-FRS total score or other domains. This may define a distinct phenotype with different onset and outcome. Worse scores in the upper and lower limb and daily living domains (FD2-FD4) were strongly associated with loss of ambulation, higher age at baseline, and longer disease duration (p < 0.001). We identified a cutoff value of 28/40, allowing to differentiate patients with less disease burden, potentially able to show better response in future clinical trials. Our study enriches the literature by correlating IBM-FRS total scores and its items with patient characteristics, offering important implications for clinical management, subgroup analysis, and future trials design.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41258934What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.