ArticleHealth promotion international2025
Using Instagram for health promotion: professional and ethical challenges for Australian nutritionists and dietitians.
Article in Health promotion international, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Nutritionists and dietitians are the leading nutrition experts, increasingly leveraging social media to share nutrition and health information. While nutritionists and dietitians share role similarities, differences in qualifications, regulatory frameworks, and scope of practice remain. This study aimed to assess and analyse the professional and ethical use of Instagram by Australian nutritionists and dietitians. Using a cross-sectional approach, 500 Instagram posts by nutritionists and dietitians were assessed using a modified Social Media Evaluation Checklist. The criteria included categories of financial disclosure, cultural awareness, evidence-based information, transparency, privacy/confidentiality, professionalism, and justifiability. Descriptive data analysis was conducted, and scores were reported in both frequencies (n) and percentages (%). Both nutritionists and dietitians primarily shared content related to diet information and service promotion on Instagram. Scores suggest good professional and ethical demonstration in areas such as cultural awareness, balanced and accurate information, adherence to scope of practice, and transparent imagery. However, inconsistencies were noted with financial disclosure, transparent advertising, referencing sources, accessible language, and safeguarding patient identity. While nutritionists and dietitians demonstrated adherence to professional and ethical practices in certain areas, not all standards were fully met. With the growing usage of social media by nutritionists and dietitians for service promotion, there is a need for clear regulations and updated guidelines tailored to these professionals, with an emphasis on transparent financial disclosure and ensuring accessibility of content. Such guidance would ensure nutritionists and dietitians uphold high ethical and professional standards, fostering public trust and enhancing credibility of information shared by these nutrition experts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.