ArticleThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America2025
Spectral cues influence perception of voice onset time when using the /ɑ/ vowel: Pitfalls and solutionsa).
Article in The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Perception of voice onset time (VOT) has frequently been used to test auditory temporal processing. However, the first formant frequency (F1) of an adjacent vowel systematically covaries with VOT, presenting a confounding spectral cue. The most problematic confound between VOT and F1 would be for a vowel such as /ɑ/, the most commonly used vowel context for VOT studies in the literature. The present study tested the hypotheses that (1) F1 cues influence perception of VOT when followed by the low vowel /ɑ/ but not when followed by the high vowel /i/, and (2) this confounding spectral cue in /ɑ/ is so salient that it is perceptible for cochlear implant users. Stimuli included a /d/-/t/ VOT continuum coupled with /ɑ/ or /i/, where VOT-F1 covariance was controlled through the ratio of VOT duration to the duration of the vowel that was replaced by aspiration (i.e., cutback ratio). For both listener groups, VOT-F1 covariance affected perception of consonants followed by /ɑ/ but not those followed by /i/. Studies pertaining to auditory temporal processing that have used consonant + /ɑ/ stimuli should be reevaluated because of the likely spectral confound. Future work in this area should use the /i/ context to more effectively isolate temporal cues.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.