Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41258669›Full record

ArticleJMIR research protocols2025

Effectiveness and Cost-Effectiveness of a Stepped Model of Care for Musculoskeletal Disorders: Protocol for a Multiarm Randomized Controlled Trial (Edu-First Trial).

Jean-Sébastien Roy, Hugo Massé-Alarie, Marc-Olivier Dubé, Anne Marie Pinard, Martin Lamontagne, Gisela Sole, Jean Tittley, Maude Laberge, Frédérique Dupuis, Félix Fiset and 3 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR research protocols, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06832852 (Is a Stepped Model of Care Cost-effective Compared to Usual Care for Musculoskeletal Disorders? a Randomized Controlled Trial), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06832852 narecruitingnot on this map

Is a Stepped Model of Care Cost-effective Compared to Usual Care for Musculoskeletal Disorders? a Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorLaval UniversityRan2025 to 2028Enrolled369ConditionsLow Back Pain, Neck Pain, Anterior Knee Pain Syndrome, Rotator-cuff Related Shoulder PainArmsStepped care, Rehabilitation Care, Medical Care
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Jean-Sébastien RoyFaculty of Medicine, Université Laval, Quebec City, QC, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-2853-9940
Hugo Massé-AlarieFaculty of Medicine, Université Laval, Quebec City, QC, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-4472-9656
Marc-Olivier DubéLa Trobe Sport and Exercise Medicine Research Center, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-5676-2982
Anne Marie PinardFaculty of Medicine, Université Laval, Quebec City, QC, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-7014-9359
Martin LamontagneFaculty of Medicine, University of Montreal, Montréal, QC, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-0249-6762
Gisela SoleSchool of Physiotherapy, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0002-1632-0338
Jean TittleyCentre for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation and Social Integration (Cirris), Quebec City, QC, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-0160-4143
Maude LabergeFaculty of Medicine, Université Laval, Quebec City, QC, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-1274-136X
Frédérique DupuisFaculty of Medicine, Université Laval, Quebec City, QC, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-0607-2908
Félix FisetFaculty of Medicine, Université Laval, Quebec City, QC, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-8886-7546
Ildephonse NduwimanaFaculty of Medicine, Université Laval, Quebec City, QC, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-6961-683X
Eric McArthurLondon Health Sciences Centre Research Institute, London, ON, Canada.ORCID 0009-0000-6944-6471
François DesmeulesFaculty of Medicine, University of Montreal, Montréal, QC, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-0290-7031

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMusculoskeletal disorders (MSKDs) are a leading cause of pain and disability, placing a substantial burden on health care systems. Optimizing resource use through innovative interventions is essential. Evidence from randomized controlled trials suggests that not all individuals with MSKDs require ongoing follow-up with a health care provider; for many, education alone is sufficient for symptom resolution. A stepped care model, which prioritizes patient education as a first-line intervention and reserves usual care for those with persistent symptoms, may enhance health care efficiency and reduce costs.

objectiveThe primary objective of this randomized controlled trial is to evaluate the effectiveness of a stepped care model compared to the 2 most common approaches for managing MSKDs: usual medical care and usual rehabilitation care. A secondary objective is to assess cost-effectiveness.

methodsThis pragmatic, noninferiority, multiarm, parallel-group randomized controlled trial will enroll 369 adults with MSKDs, randomly assigned to one of three 12-week intervention groups: stepped care, usual medical care (physician-led), or usual rehabilitation care (physiotherapist-led). Participants in the stepped care group will first complete a 6-week education program. Those with persistent symptoms after 6 weeks will receive rehabilitation interventions, while participants whose symptoms have resolved will receive no further intervention. The primary outcome is functional limitations at 24 weeks. Secondary outcomes include pain severity, health-related quality of life, pain-related fear, and pain self-efficacy, assessed at baseline and at 6, 12, and 24 weeks. Linear mixed models will be used for group comparisons, and incremental cost-effectiveness analyses will evaluate cost-effectiveness. The ethics committee of the CIUSSS-CN approved the project (#2024-2982). Findings will be shared through clinical and community platforms, peer-reviewed publications, and conference presentations.

resultsThe Edu-First trial is funded by a project grant from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (grant #495615). Recruitment began on January 31, 2025. As of September 2025, a total of 65 participants have been enrolled. Recruitment is expected to continue for up to 3 years, targeting approximately 10 new participants per month, and is anticipated to be completed by Winter 2028.

conclusionsWe anticipate that the stepped care model will be noninferior to usual medical care and usual rehabilitation care in terms of treatment effectiveness. Furthermore, it is expected to be cost-effective by reducing reliance on expensive resources, such as provider consultations and medical investigations. By emphasizing education and self-management as the initial approach, the stepped care model may enhance access to care without compromising quality, while empowering patients to actively manage their condition. Findings from this study could inform systemic changes in MSKD care delivery, improving treatment accessibility and reducing the average cost per care episode.

trial registrationClinicalTrial.gov NCT06832852; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT06832852. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/77574.

Indexed as

Cost-Benefit AnalysisMusculoskeletal DiseasesAdultEquivalence Trials as TopicFemaleHumansMalePatient Education as TopicPragmatic Clinical Trials as TopicQuality of LifeRandomized Controlled Trials as Topicanterior knee paincost-effectivenesseducationlow back painneck pain.rehabilitationshoulder pain

Identifiers

PMID41258669
PMCPMC12676218

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.