ReviewThe ultrasound journal2025
Intraoperative elastography and spinal surgery: a systematic review of current and future applications in clinical and preclinical models.
Review in The ultrasound journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundWhile conventional imaging provides excellent structural detail of the spine, it cannot assess the mechanical properties of spinal tissue in real time. Ultrasound elastography (USE) is an emerging modality that quantifies tissue stiffness, offering a potential solution to this diagnostic gap. This review synthesizes the current evidence for the use of USE in spinal pathology. MAIN BODY: A systematic review of the PubMed, Cochrane, and Web of Science databases was conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines, yielding seven primary studies, three clinical and four preclinical, published between 2015 and 2024. These studies, comprising preclinical and clinical data, demonstrate USE's ability to provide real-time, quantitative feedback. Key applications identified include quantifying tension relief in tethered cord syndrome, differentiating spinal tumors from healthy tissue based on stiffness values, and assessing the biomechanical severity of acute and chronic spinal cord injury. Shear wave elastography (SWE) was the predominant modality, proving superior to strain elastography (SE) for spinal applications.
conclusionUSE is a powerful adjunct to traditional spinal imaging, providing unique functional data that can enhance intraoperative surgical precision and decision-making. While challenges such as depth penetration and operator standardization remain, continued research and technological innovation position USE to significantly improve diagnostic accuracy and surgical outcomes in spinal disease management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.