ArticleJournal of molecular modeling2025
Theoretical study on the bonding properties and separation performance of ligands with symmetric and asymmetric side rings and ortho-phenanthroline skeletons for Am(III)/Eu(III).
Article in Journal of molecular modeling, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
contextSelective separation of trivalent actinides from chemically similar lanthanides remains a central challenge in advanced nuclear fuel reprocessing. To identify structural and electronic factors that govern Am(III)/Eu(III) selectivity, we investigated six 1,10-phenanthroline-based N-donor ligands bearing symmetric or asymmetric side rings. Calculations indicate metal-ligand interactions are predominantly ionic with measurable covalent contributions; Am(III) complexes exhibit shorter bonds, higher Wiberg bond indices, and larger charge transfer than Eu(III) analogues. Projected density of states and charge-decomposition analyses show stronger 5f participation in Am(III) bonding, rationalizing preferential Am binding. Electrostatic potential and thermodynamic results further indicate that symmetric pyrrole side rings yield lower surface potentials and stronger binding, and computed free-energy differences confirm complexation with Am(III) is thermodynamically more favorable. These results delineate how electrostatics and f-orbital covalency jointly determine Am/Eu discrimination and provide practical guidance for designing more effective N-donor extractants.
methodsDensity functional theory (PBE0) was used with relativistic effective core potentials (Am: ECP60MWB-SEG; Eu: ECP28MWB-SEG). Solvent effects (n-dodecane, cyclohexanone, 1-octanol) were modeled with CPCM. Bonding analyses included Wiberg bond indices, QTAIM, NBO/CDA, EDA, and PDOS. Gibbs free energies were derived from 298.15 K thermal corrections, and all optimized structures were verified as minima by frequency analysis; spin-orbit coupling was not included.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41258573What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.