ArticleInternational urogynecology journal2026
Influence of Pubovisceral Avulsion on Perineal Body Descent and Prolapse Development.
Article in International urogynecology journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Influence of Pubovisceral Avulsion on Perineal Body Descent and Prolapse Development.International urogynecology journal · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introduction and hypothesisPubovisceral muscle (PVM) avulsion affects over a third of women post-vaginal childbirth and is a significant risk factor for pelvic floor dysfunction (PFD). Prior studies show that even a 5 mm posterior-inferior shift of the perineal body (PB) enlarges the genital hiatus, contributing to prolapse. Building on this, we investigated the relationship between PVM avulsion and PB movement, correlated prolapse metrics, and sacrum/coccygeal movement with the injury. Moreover, we used statistical shape modeling (SSM) to see shape variation among different groups.
methodsA total of 112 MR defecography scans were included from a mixed sample of clinical defecography's. This includes 68 radiologic cystocele patients, 20 patients who were obstruction defecation patients, and 20 nulliparous patients, taken from previous studies Routzong et al. (Ann Biomed Eng 51(7):1461-70); Martin et al. (Int Urogynecol J 36:1607-1615); Routzong et al. (Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Eng 24(2):122-30). These scans were analyzed using axial T2 images to assess PVM avulsion. Patients were categorized into four groups: asymptomatic-nulliparous, non-avulsed, partial avulsed, and avulsed. The asymptomatic group was excluded from statistical analysis because of differences in demographic variables. Measurements were performed on mid-sagittal slices using HOROS at rest and evacuation. SSM was then used to assess shape variation of the pelvic floor.
resultsAmong 89 parous patients, 25 had avulsion, 18 partial avulsions, and 46 were non-avulsed. The avulsed group was significantly older (p = 0.001), with more pregnancies (p = 0.049) and deliveries (p = 0.021). At rest, they showed increased pubic symphysis-to-PB distance (p < 0.001), and greater bladder descent during evacuation (p = 0.003). Vaginal apex was well-supported in the non-avulsed group at rest (p < 0.001), while sacrococcygeal angle (p = 0.031) significantly increased in avulsed patients. SSM identified shape variation with the avulsed group having the greatest descent of the pelvic floor musculature, perineal body shift, and overall increased levator bowl area.
conclusionsIn a cohort of women undergoing pelvic MR defecography, we observed PVM avulsion is associated with inferior PB shift, increased bladder descent, and shape changes to the sacrum/coccyx, underscoring its impact on level III support. Despite limitations from the retrospective design and patient selection, these findings offer valuable insight into the anatomical consequences of avulsion during rest and defecation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41258541What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.