ArticleCommunications medicine2025
Patient-specific musculoskeletal modeling to enhance preoperative planning for pelvic fracture reduction.
Article in Communications medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Exploring Artificial Intelligence in Orthopedic Surgery: A Review of Perception, Decision, and Execution Systems.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Robot-assisted closed reduction and navigated fixation for pelvic ring injuries: a focused narrative review of a reduction-fixation-audit framework.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Review
- Evidence-informed methodological approaches for coupled neuromusculoskeletal-finite element analysis workflows in orthopaedic biomechanics.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026Article
- Patient-specific musculoskeletal modeling to enhance preoperative planning for pelvic fracture reduction.Communications medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPelvic fracture surgery is a highly complex and skill-dependent procedure due to adjacent neurovascular structures. These challenges often result in prolonged operative time, elevated complication rates, and repeated reduction attempts. To support surgeons in overcoming these difficulties, our study introduces a rapid modeling approach that enables precise preoperative planning and quantitative evaluation of reduction strategies.
methodsWe developed an automated patient-specific modeling method that integrates Statistical Shape Models with the personalized modeling modules of the OpenSim software's Application Programming Interface for generating personalized musculoskeletal models. Using this approach, we rapidly reconstructed reduction models for 10 patients (age range: 49-72) with pelvic fractures and validated the results against clinical reduction force data.
resultsHere we show that the SMAG framework generates patient-specific models 78% faster than manual methods while reducing reconstruction errors to below 7.7%. Validation against clinical data demonstrates force prediction with an average error of 13.8%, within clinically acceptable limits (<10 N vs. typical 15-25 N traction force). Optimal reduction paths identified reduced peak forces from 555.4 N to 97.4 N.
conclusionsOur method transforms pelvic fracture management by translating surgical expertise into quantifiable, data-rich biomechanical parameters. This data-driven framework not only enables optimized surgical planning for both robotic and manual procedures but also provides a high-resolution quantitative basis for AI-enhanced decision support. By shifting the field from a subjective art to an objective science, our approach standardizes surgical outcomes and paves the way for intelligent systems that deliver more precise and higher-quality surgical planning.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.