Observational studyJournal of neurology2025
Therapeutic impact of leuprorelin acetate on spinal and bulbar muscular atrophy: pre- and post-marketing observational study.
Observational study in Journal of neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Although leuprorelin acetate, a luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone agonist, has been approved based on short-term clinical trials conducted in Japan, its long-term efficacy on physical function remains unclear. We aimed to evaluate the long-term therapeutic efficacy of leuprorelin acetate using real-world clinical data through a self-controlled trend-shift analysis. The analysis included 91 genetically confirmed patients with spinal and bulbar muscular atrophy, with follow-up data collected before and after treatment initiation. The functional outcomes assessed included the revised amyotrophic lateral sclerosis functional rating scale (ALSFRS-R) and modified Norris scales, grip power, and serum creatinine levels. Leuprorelin acetate significantly slowed disease progression. For instance, the annual ALSFRS-R decline rate improved from approximately 0.5 points pre-treatment to 0.2 points post-treatment. The subgroup analysis supported the potential benefit of early intervention. These findings highlight the value of leveraging patient registries and post-marketing real-world data to evaluate treatment efficacy in slowly progressive diseases, such as SBMA, where traditional randomized controlled trials are often limited by insufficient statistical power to detect therapeutic efficacy. They also underscore the need for innovative methodologies to assess post-approval drug performance, paving the way for improved clinical outcomes for neurodegenerative diseases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41258507What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.