Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41258502›Full record

ArticleSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2025

Factors associated with period of sick leave after gynecologic cancer treatment: a prospective cohort study.

Yoshinori Tani, Keiichiro Nakamura, Hanako Sugihara, Shinsuke Shirakawa, Hirofumi Matsuoka, Naoyuki Ida, Junko Haraga, Chikako Ogawa, Eriko Eto, Shoji Nagao and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Yoshinori TaniDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-5-1 Shikata-Cho, Kita-Ku, Okayama, 700-8558, Japan.
Keiichiro NakamuraDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-5-1 Shikata-Cho, Kita-Ku, Okayama, 700-8558, Japan. k-nakamu@cc.okayama-u.ac.jp.
Hanako SugiharaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-5-1 Shikata-Cho, Kita-Ku, Okayama, 700-8558, Japan.
Shinsuke ShirakawaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-5-1 Shikata-Cho, Kita-Ku, Okayama, 700-8558, Japan.
Hirofumi MatsuokaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-5-1 Shikata-Cho, Kita-Ku, Okayama, 700-8558, Japan.
Naoyuki IdaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-5-1 Shikata-Cho, Kita-Ku, Okayama, 700-8558, Japan.
Junko HaragaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-5-1 Shikata-Cho, Kita-Ku, Okayama, 700-8558, Japan.
Chikako OgawaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-5-1 Shikata-Cho, Kita-Ku, Okayama, 700-8558, Japan.
Eriko EtoDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-5-1 Shikata-Cho, Kita-Ku, Okayama, 700-8558, Japan.
Shoji NagaoDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-5-1 Shikata-Cho, Kita-Ku, Okayama, 700-8558, Japan.
Hisashi MasuyamaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-5-1 Shikata-Cho, Kita-Ku, Okayama, 700-8558, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeGynecologic cancer is one of the most common malignancies in working-age women. This study aimed to investigate factors associated with period of sick leave after gynecologic cancer treatment in Japan.

methodsA prospective cohort study on period of sick leave was conducted among 207 cancer survivors who returned to work at the same workplace. Questionnaires were randomly distributed to patients aged under 65 years and more than one-year post-treatment. Clinical information was extracted from medical records, and the factors influencing the period of sick leave were analyzed using the Mann-Whitney U test and logistic regression analysis.

resultsSurgery plus more than six courses of chemotherapy (number (n) = 41, 166.02 ± 146.84 days) led to a significantly longer period of sick leave than surgery without lymph node dissection (n = 64, 31.15 ± 30.47 days), surgery with lymph node dissection (n = 41, 55.56 ± 85.90 days), surgery plus less than six courses of chemotherapy (n = 21, 72.42 ± 56.07 days), and radiotherapy alone (n = 21, 58.85 ± 84.24 days) (OR: 2.63, 2.95, 2.67, and 2.08; 95% CI: 7.71-54.59, 18.17-92.94, 18.22-126.63, and 2.38-115.33; p = 0.009, p = 0.004, p = 0.009, and p = 0.041). gynecologic cancer survivors who experienced adverse effects after treatment had a significantly longer period of sick leave (OR: 8.50; CI: 52.98-84.98; p < 0.001). In univariate and multivariate analyses, patients who received surgery plus more than six courses of chemotherapy were most involved in long period of sick leave than other factors (OR: 11.20, and 16.997; CI: 4.86-25.08, and 5.51-52.35; p < 0.001, and p < 0.001).

conclusionPatients with gynecologic cancer requiring long-term treatment required the most time to return to work.

Indexed as

Genital Neoplasms, FemaleSick LeaveAdultAgedCohort StudiesFemaleHumansJapanLogistic ModelsLymph Node ExcisionMiddle AgedProspective StudiesSurveys and QuestionnairesSurvivorsTime FactorsGynecologic cancer survivorsPeriod of sick leaveSix or more cycles of chemotherapySurgery plus chemotherapy

Identifiers

PMID41258502
PMCPMC12630257

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.