ArticleSurgery today2026
Preoperative risk assessment using GNRI and mFI-5 enhances prediction of postoperative complications in older adults with colorectal cancer.
Article in Surgery today, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- The value of perioperative nutritional risk stratification in the prevention of surgical site infection: precision application from GLIM/PG-SGA to PNI, CONUT, and GNRI.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeFrailty and malnutrition, which are common in older adult patients with colorectal cancer (CRC), adversely affect outcomes. Although the Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index (GNRI) and the Modified Frailty Index (mFI-5) are established tools, their combined predictive value for postoperative complications remains unclear. Therefore, we investigated whether their combination improved risk prediction.
methodsWe analyzed 399 CRC ≥ 65 years of age who underwent curative surgery. Preoperative assessment included frailty (mFI-5 ≥ 2) and nutritional risk (GNRI < 98). Patients were stratified into low- (no factors), intermediate- (one factor), and high-risk (both factors) groups. Clavien-Dindo grade ≥ II complications were analyzed by multivariate logistic regression to identify predictive factors.
resultsInfectious complications increased significantly across the low-, intermediate-, and high-risk groups (13.3%, 14.6%, and 30.2%, respectively), with overall complication rates of 20.7%, 22.2%, and 45.3%, respectively. The median postoperative stay increased with increased risk (12, 14, and 18 days, respectively). Anastomotic leakage was more frequent, though not to a statistically significant extent, in high-risk patients. High-risk status independently predicted infectious and overall complications.
conclusionsCombined GNRI and mFI-5 assessments facilitated effective stratification of postoperative risk in older adults with CRC. These assessments may help in routine preoperative evaluations and support individualized perioperative care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41258486What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.