ArticleEuropean radiology2026
BI-RADS-compliant structured mammography reporting using locally deployed large language models under privacy constraints.
Article in European radiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Effectiveness, Safety, and Workflow Burden of Large Language Model-Based Medical Report Generation: Systematic Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo develop a privacy-preserving method for structuring free-text mammography reports using a locally fine-tuned, open-source large language model (LLM). MATERIALS AND
methodsIn this multicenter study, 7161 unstructured mammography reports were collected from three institutions. The open-source Llama-3 model was fine-tuned via supervised learning using pseudo-labels from the commercial Qwen-Max model with low-rank adaptation. All labels were pseudo-labels generated by the commercial Qwen-Max model rather than human annotations. Structured outputs followed a BI-RADS-oriented nested JSON schema. Performance was evaluated across 23 features using Precision, Recall, and F1-score. Structural integrity was assessed using the JSON format accuracy (JFA) and field integrity accuracy (FIA) metrics. Statistical comparisons were performed using the paired Wilcoxon signed-rank test and Cohen's d effect size.
resultsA total of 7161 reports were retrospectively obtained from three institutions and analyzed. The fine-tuned model achieved strong performance at epoch 10 (Precision 0.942, Recall 0.929, F1-score 0.932), with JFA and FIA reaching 0.964 and 1.000, respectively, showing significant gains over the base model (p < 0.05, Cohen's d > 0.8). While slightly below Qwen-Max overall, the model exhibited moderate yet statistically significant differences (p < 0.05; 0.5 < Cohen's d < 0.8), particularly in the "special signs" category (F1 = 0.737 vs 0.947).
conclusionThis method effectively converts mammography reports into structured data using a locally fine-tuned, open-source LLM. Although there is a slight performance trade-off, it improves privacy and can be deployed locally. Its accuracy, clinical relevance, and compliance make it a practical solution for medical institutions. KEY POINTS: Question Free-text mammography reports lack standardization, making structured extraction difficult, while existing solutions often compromise privacy, adaptability, or require costly commercial tools. Findings Our fine-tuned LLaMA-3 model achieved high extraction accuracy (F1-score: 0.932) and complete structural integrity (FIA: 1.000) within a fully local deployment pipeline. Clinical relevance This method enables standardized and privacy-preserving mammography reporting without disruption to the clinical workflow, supporting safer AI integration, enhanced data quality, and compliance with regulations such as the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR).
Indexed as
Identifiers
41258455What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.