ArticleInternational journal of legal medicine2026
PMI estimation with cross-species transfer learning and visual information generated by pathomics foundation model.
Article in International journal of legal medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Artificial intelligence in forensic science: a systematic review. Part II: long-range postmortem interval estimation.International journal of legal medicine · 2026Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundEstimating the postmortem interval (PMI) is a key task in forensic science. Deep learning-based pathology image analysis offers a promising approach, but existing pathomics methods face two major challenges: limited translatability from animal to human samples and insufficient model interpretability.
methodsWe propose a PMI estimation framework based on a pathomics foundation model with a two-stage cross-species transfer learning strategy. In the first stage, the model is fine-tuned on porcine liver whole-slide images (WSIs); in the second, it is further fine-tuned with a small amount of human data to achieve effective knowledge transfer. To improve interpretability, model predictions are visualized at the whole-slide level using probability maps, class maps, and classification proportion histograms.
resultsSixteen porcine and twenty-three human samples were used to evaluate four deep learning models-ResNet50, DenseNet121, SongCi, and UNI-for PMI estimation. The Vision Transformer-based UNI model achieved the best performance, with 91.63% accuracy in porcine data. After transfer learning with limited human samples, accuracy increased to 78.95%, representing a more than 50% improvement compared to the untuned model. The visualization framework further enhanced interpretability and traceability of the model's outputs.
conclusionThis study demonstrates that combining animal data priors with a fine-tuning strategy using minimal human data and whole-slide visualization enables cross-species PMI estimation. The proposed framework addresses data scarcity, enhances model transparency, and provides a practical and interpretable AI-based tool for forensic pathology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41258447What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.