Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41258434›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Hybrid ST-ResNet and LSTM approach for precise crime hotspot prediction.

Nasim Shahmoradi, Ali Asghar Alesheikh, Ali Jafari, Aynaz Lotfata

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Nasim ShahmoradiDepartment of Geospatial Information Systems, Faculty of Geodesy and Geomatics Engineering, K. N. Toosi University of Technology, Tehran, Iran.
Ali Asghar AlesheikhDepartment of Geospatial Information Systems, Faculty of Geodesy and Geomatics Engineering, K. N. Toosi University of Technology, Tehran, Iran. alesheikh@kntu.ac.ir.
Ali JafariDepartment of Geospatial Information Systems, Faculty of Geodesy and Geomatics Engineering, K. N. Toosi University of Technology, Tehran, Iran.
Aynaz LotfataDepartment of Pathology, Microbiology, and Immunology, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California, Davis, Davis, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Crime is a critical social issue that threatens public safety, and accurately predicting and reducing crime in hotspot areas is a key objective. Crime patterns are inherently complex, with substantial spatial and temporal variability, which makes accurate prediction challenging. This study addresses these intricacies by leveraging advanced deep learning models, including Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) and Recurrent Neural Networks (RNNs), to enhance predictive accuracy in crime hotspots. Specifically, we integrate ST-ResNet for spatio-temporal analysis with Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) networks to model temporal dependencies, overcoming ST-ResNet's limitation in capturing sequential patterns in crime data. To further improve predictive accuracy, we introduce a feature: the daily Euclidean distance of each crime to the nearest park as a secondary input channel for ST-ResNet, supplemented by historical crime data. Additionally, weather conditions and temporal variables are incorporated into the model's fully connected layer as additional inputs. Our method achieves a mean hit rate of over 88% at finer spatial resolutions (500 m), outperforming existing models, which tend to perform better only at coarser resolutions (1000 m). By capturing finer spatial details, our approach proves more effective in identifying theft hotspots across Chicago, offering valuable insights for developing targeted crime prevention strategies.

Indexed as

CrimeNeural Networks, ComputerDeep LearningHumansSpatio-Temporal AnalysisHotspot mappingLSTM networksReal-time crime predictionSpatio-temporal analysisST-ResNet

Identifiers

PMID41258434
PMCPMC12630685

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.