ArticleScientific reports2025
Comprehensive detection of structural variations in long and short reads dataset of French cattle.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Resolving Cattle GWAS Loci: Current Progress, Persistent Challenges and Future Directions.Current issues in molecular biology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Structural variants (SVs) correspond to different types of genomic variants larger than 50 bp. Many findings suggest the use of long-read (LR) rather than short-read (SR) sequencing to improve the accuracy of SVs detection. Here, we present the results of an in-depth analysis for detection of SVs, mainly large insertions and deletions, in 14 French bovine breeds, based on whole-genome sequence (WGS) data comprising 176 LR and 571 SR samples, with 154 individuals having both LR and SR data available. We first investigated possible biases on the performances of well-known SVs detection tools, namely CUTESV, PBSV, and SNIFFLES, using LR from different technologies, including PacBio HiFi, Oxford ONT, and PacBio CLR. We subsequently highlighted the abilities of tools for detecting SVs (DELLY, LUMPY, and MANTA) and for genotyping known SVs (GRAPHTYPER, SVTYPER, PARAGRAPH, and VG toolkit) using SR data. We then show how the incremental composition of samples in the reference panel affected the SVs genotyping for six validation individuals sequenced in SR. We then searched for the optimal parameters and created the final SVs reference panel consisting of 25,191 deletions and 30,118 insertions. Finally, we emphasized the landscape of the genotyped SVs segregating across 571 SR individuals of 14 breeds.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.