Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41258421›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Construction and validation of a risk prediction model for complications in patients with acute leukemia based on machine learning.

Rong Xu, Hong Tian, Sufang Zhao, Shulan Gu

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Rong XuDepartment of Hematology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, 215000, China.
Hong TianDepartment of Hematology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, 215000, China.
Sufang ZhaoDepartment of Hematology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, 215000, China.
Shulan GuDepartment of Hematology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, 215000, China. zhuchengming1987@126.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Early-phase severe complications remain a major cause of morbidity and mortality during induction chemotherapy for acute leukaemia. Existing risk scores capture only limited prognostic variance and are rarely well-calibrated for clinical decision support. To develop and externally validate a machine-learning model that accurately predicts severe complications after induction, and to assess its clinical utility across key patient sub-groups. We retrospectively assembled electronic-health-record data from three tertiary haematology centres (2013-2024). After exclusion of duplicates and predefined ineligible cases, 2 870 adults with newly diagnosed AML or ALL were analysed (derivation = 2 009; external validation = 861). Forty-two candidate predictors spanning demographics, comorbidity indices, baseline laboratory values, disease biology and treatment logistics were selected via multiple imputation, Winsorised z-scaling and correlation filtering. Five supervised algorithms-including Elastic-Net, Random Forest, XGBoost, LightGBM and a multilayer perceptron-were trained using nested 5-fold cross-validation. Discrimination, calibration, decision-curve net benefit and SHAP-based interpretability were evaluated according to TRIPOD-AI and PROBAST-AI recommendations. LightGBM achieved the highest mean AUROC in derivation (0.824 ± 0.008) and maintained robust performance in external validation (AUROC = 0.801, 95% CI 0.774-0.827; AUPRC = 0.628). Calibration was excellent (slope = 0.97; intercept = - 0.03; Hosmer-Lemeshow p = 0.41). Decision-curve analysis showed superior net benefit over "treat-all," "treat-none," and a four-variable logistic benchmark across risk thresholds of 5-40%, potentially enabling targeted interventions for 14 additional high-risk patients per 100 at a 20% threshold, though clinical benefit requires prospective validation. Discrimination remained ≥ 0.80 in AML, older adults and all three centres. CRP, absolute neutrophil count, cytogenetic-risk tier, age and ferritin were the top predictors, with interpretable monotonic SHAP effects. A rigorously validated LightGBM model provides well-calibrated, interpretable prediction of early severe complications after induction therapy for acute leukaemia and provides a foundation for risk-adapted supportive care strategies, though prospective studies are needed to demonstrate clinical impact. Prospective implementation studies are warranted to confirm real-world impact.

Indexed as

Leukemia, Myeloid, AcuteMachine LearningPrecursor Cell Lymphoblastic Leukemia-LymphomaAdultAgedAlgorithmsFemaleHumansInduction ChemotherapyMaleMiddle AgedPrognosisRetrospective StudiesRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsAcute leukaemiaComplication predictionInduction chemotherapyLightgbmMachine learningRisk stratificationTRIPOD-AI

Identifiers

PMID41258421
PMCPMC12630594

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.