Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41258412›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

The epidemiology of scaphoid fractures and non-unions in Switzerland: a nationwide analysis of the socioeconomic impact.

Esin Rothenfluh, Esther Vögelin, Stefan Markus Scholz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Esin RothenfluhDepartment of Plastic and Hand Surgery, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, Bern, Switzerland. Esin.Rothenfluh@me.com.
Esther VögelinDepartment of Plastic and Hand Surgery, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, Bern, Switzerland.
Stefan Markus ScholzDepartment of Statistics, Suva (Swiss National Accident Insurance Fund), Lucerne, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Scaphoid fractures are the second most common wrist injury after distal radius fractures and primarily affect young individuals in their most productive working years. Some scaphoid fractures fail to heal, potentially resulting in chronic pain, functional impairment, and long-term osteoarthritis in the wrist, which may require salvage procedures and can have a significant impact on work capacity. Considerable debate exists around the biological and injury-related risk factors for scaphoid non-unions, as well as the criteria for surgical intervention. However, epidemiological data are still limited, often derived from small populations, and incidence reports about scaphoid non-unions remain inconsistent. In a retrospective analysis of over 9 Mio injuries, recorded by the Swiss National Accident Insurance (Suva) Statistical Service from 2008 to 2021, we identified 16,691 scaphoid fractures. The male-to-female ratio was 4:1 for both scaphoid fractures and non-unions. The rate of primary surgery was 1:3. Around 14% of scaphoid fractures progressed to non-union, and 3% developed posttraumatic arthritis. Patients with non-unions were three times more likely to be unable to work for more than 12 months. Blue-collar workers were particularly at risk for a non-union and for extended work absence. Notably, the type of treatment (surgical or non-surgical) had no significant effect on work absence-non-union itself was the key determinant.

Indexed as

Fractures, BoneFractures, UnunitedScaphoid BoneWrist InjuriesAdolescentAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsSocioeconomic FactorsSwitzerlandYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID41258412
PMCPMC12630678

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.