ArticleScientific reports2025
A hybrid EMG-EEG interface for robust intention detection and fatigue-adaptive control of an elbow rehabilitation robot.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Closed-Loop Neuromodulation for Brain Fatigue: From Real-Time Biomarkers to Adaptive Intervention.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Motion Neural Monitoring Based on Flexible Materials: From Signal Acquisition to Training Enhancement.ACS omega · 2026Review
- Detecting and Improving Human Cognitive State in Real-Time Using Data-Driven Adaptive Systems: A Systematic Review.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Design of dynamic adaptive control framework for exoskeleton robot driven by neuromuscular signal based on deep reinforcement learning.Frontiers in computational neuroscience · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Accurate detection of user intention is a critical requirement for intelligent control systems in upper-limb rehabilitation robots. However, electromyography (EMG)-based recognition can degrade significantly under muscle fatigue. To address this limitation, we propose a hybrid EMG-electroencephalography (EEG) control framework that adaptively fuses peripheral (EMG) and central (EEG) biosignals for robust classification of elbow flexion and extension tasks. The system integrates a support vector machine (SVM)-based EMG classifier and a Common Spatial Pattern (CSP)-SVM EEG classifier, combined through a Bayesian fusion strategy whose weights are modulated in real time according to fatigue levels estimated from EMG spectral features via a k-nearest neighbors (k-NN) model. The hybrid framework was deployed on a lightweight robotic rehabilitation platform and evaluated with five healthy participants (3 females, age 26-39). Results show that adaptive fusion significantly outperformed unimodal baselines, achieving 94.5% classification accuracy (vs. 88.5% for EMG-only) with an end-to-end latency below 500 ms. Importantly, the fatigue-aware weighting preserved performance during high-fatigue conditions (91.4% vs. 83.1% for EMG-only), enhancing system robustness during prolonged sessions. These findings demonstrate the feasibility of a scalable, real-time, fatigue-adaptive control strategy with strong potential for clinical stroke rehabilitation and motor recovery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.