ArticleNPJ digital medicine2025
Continuous and componentized facial palsy measurement alignment and clinical interpretable model.
Article in NPJ digital medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- AI-Based Angle Map Analysis of Facial Asymmetry in Peripheral Facial Palsy.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
31 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Facial palsy, affecting 1 in 60 individuals, requires precise assessment for effective treatment and follow-up. Current grading systems are inconsistent due to redundant subjective factors. Discrete assessment of the whole face fails to address eyelid and mouth movements innervated by separate nerves. Herein, we proposed modified House-Brackmann (H-B) criteria with continuous and componentized measurements for the eyelids and mouth. Using a dataset of 274 patients with vestibular schwannoma (VS), we developed a dense facial landmark alignment model. This model outperformed existing algorithms in facial palsy detection and produced clinically interpretable asymmetric coefficients of eyelids and mouth correlated with consensus H-B grades (r = 0.892 and 0.890, P < 0.001). Thresholds from ROC analysis transformed these coefficients into grades, comparable to consensus H-B grades. Validated in a separate post-VS multi-center cohort, this model showed high accuracy (eyelid Grade 6 not observed; analyses restricted accordingly) and potential for continuous monitoring of facial palsy, offering a more precise and comprehensive assessment tool. Trial Registration Information the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR1900024638; July 19, 2019).
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.