Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41258375›Full record

ArticleInsights into imaging2025

Assessing brain metastasis response to immunotherapy: a pictorial review of atypical responses and intracranial adverse events.

Gary Amseian, Francisco Aya, Camilo Pineda, Sofía González-Ortiz, Juan-Andrés Mora, Maria-Lourdes Olondo, Andres Perissinotti, Gabriela-Ailen Caballero, Iban Aldecoa, Laura Mezquita and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Insights into imaging, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Gary AmseianDepartment of Radiology, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain. amseian@clinic.cat.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-5464-1342
Francisco AyaDepartment of Medical Oncology, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3452-7607
Camilo PinedaDepartment of Radiology, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-8761-0113
Sofía González-OrtizDepartment of Radiology, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2578-6671
Juan-Andrés MoraDepartment of Radiology, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-6761-5228
Maria-Lourdes OlondoDepartment of Radiology, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Andres PerissinottiInstitut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4190-2425
Gabriela-Ailen CaballeroUniversitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0739-4896
Iban AldecoaUniversitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5774-7453
Laura MezquitaUniversitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0936-7338
Josep PuigDepartment of Radiology, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2791-6599
Ana AranceDepartment of Medical Oncology, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2896-1957
Núria BargallóDepartment of Radiology, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6284-5402
Laura OleagaDepartment of Radiology, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9702-0451

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Immunotherapy, particularly immune checkpoint inhibitors, plays a crucial role in the treatment of brain metastases in various primary cancers. Response assessment encompasses atypical patterns, including pseudoprogression, hyperprogression, or dissociated response, which present greater complexity than classical patterns defined by standardized response assessment criteria. Additionally, intracranial adverse events like hypophysitis or encephalitis may resemble tumor progression. Accurate evaluation and management of brain metastases during immunotherapy requires that radiologists are familiar with both classical and atypical response patterns, as well as potential intracranial adverse events. Brain MRI and advanced imaging techniques serve as essential tools for this purpose. CRITICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: Assessing brain metastases response to immunotherapy accurately is fundamental for therapeutic decision-making. Radiologists must recognize classical and atypical responses and adverse events associated with immunotherapy to ensure optimal patient management. KEY POINTS: Immunotherapy response assessment in brain metastases is complex due to atypical patterns including pseudoprogression, hyperprogression, and dissociated responses. Immunotherapy-induced intracranial adverse events, such as hypophysitis and encephalitis, must be accurately identified. Brain MRI, complemented by advanced imaging techniques (perfusion MRI, MRS, and amino acid PET), is crucial for distinguishing these complex scenarios.

Indexed as

Brain metastasisImmune-related adverse eventsImmunotherapyPseudoprogressionResponse assessment

Identifiers

PMID41258375
PMCPMC12630472

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.