ArticleInsights into imaging2025
Assessing brain metastasis response to immunotherapy: a pictorial review of atypical responses and intracranial adverse events.
Article in Insights into imaging, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Post-therapy imaging of adult brain tumours: patterns, pitfalls, and practical framework.Insights into imaging · 2026Article
- Durable Intracranial Control Beyond Five Years in EGFR Wild-Type Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer with Sequential Brain Metastases Managed with Multimodal Therapy: A Case Report.Reports (MDPI) · 2026Article
- Unraveling the Enigma of Melanoma Brain Metastasis: New Molecular Insights and Therapeutic Directions.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Targeting lineage-specific heterogeneity and hypovascular-fibrotic barriers may enable precision immunotherapy in pituitary neuroendocrine tumors.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Immunotherapy, particularly immune checkpoint inhibitors, plays a crucial role in the treatment of brain metastases in various primary cancers. Response assessment encompasses atypical patterns, including pseudoprogression, hyperprogression, or dissociated response, which present greater complexity than classical patterns defined by standardized response assessment criteria. Additionally, intracranial adverse events like hypophysitis or encephalitis may resemble tumor progression. Accurate evaluation and management of brain metastases during immunotherapy requires that radiologists are familiar with both classical and atypical response patterns, as well as potential intracranial adverse events. Brain MRI and advanced imaging techniques serve as essential tools for this purpose. CRITICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: Assessing brain metastases response to immunotherapy accurately is fundamental for therapeutic decision-making. Radiologists must recognize classical and atypical responses and adverse events associated with immunotherapy to ensure optimal patient management. KEY POINTS: Immunotherapy response assessment in brain metastases is complex due to atypical patterns including pseudoprogression, hyperprogression, and dissociated responses. Immunotherapy-induced intracranial adverse events, such as hypophysitis and encephalitis, must be accurately identified. Brain MRI, complemented by advanced imaging techniques (perfusion MRI, MRS, and amino acid PET), is crucial for distinguishing these complex scenarios.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.