Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41258373›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Compact machine learning model for perioperative stroke prediction prior to surgery: A retrospective cohort study.

Mi-Young Oh, Hee-Soo Kim, Young Mi Jung, Hyung-Chul Lee, Seung-Bo Lee, Seung Mi Lee

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Mi-Young Oh *Department of Neurology, Sejong General Hospital, Bucheon-si, Republic of Korea.
Hee-Soo Kim *Department of Medical Informatics, Keimyung University School of Medicine, Daegu, Republic of Korea.
Young Mi JungDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Republic of Korea.
Hyung-Chul LeeDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Seung-Bo LeeDepartment of Medical Informatics, Keimyung University School of Medicine, Daegu, Republic of Korea. koreateam23@gmail.com.
Seung Mi LeeDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, College of Medicine, Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea. lbsm@snu.ac.kr.

Funding

a grant from the Korea Health Technology R&D Project through the Korea Health Industry Development Institute (KHIDI), funded by the Ministry of Health & Welfare, Republic of Korea RS-2025-02213591a grant of the Korea Health Technology R&D Project through the Korea Health Industry Development Institute (KHIDI), funded by the Ministry of Health &Welfare, Republic of Korea RS-2025-02307233Institute of Information & communications Technology Planning & Evaluation (IITP) grant funded by the Korea government(MSIT) NO.RS-2021-II211343, Artificial Intelligence Graduate School Program (Seoul National University)NAVER Digital Bio Innovation Research Fund, funded by NAVER Corporation 3720242140the Korea Health Technology R&D Project through the Korea Health Industry Development Institute (KHIDI), funded by the Ministry of Health & Welfare, Republic of Korea HI22C0452
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Perioperative stroke significantly impacts postoperative outcomes. Current risk stratification methods for perioperative stroke prediction lack accuracy and practicality. We aimed to develop a machine learning (ML) model that improves both accuracy and usability for predicting perioperative strokes. Data from 36,502 patients at Seoul National University Hospital (SNUH) were utilized to develop and internally validate. An external validation was conducted using data from 404 patients at Boramae Medical Center (BMC). Perioperative stroke was defined as a brain infarction of ischemic etiology, occurring within 30 days post-surgery. We developed ML-based prediction models comprising preoperative features and compared them with cardiovascular scores. Additionally, we developed a compact model utilizing the 10 most significant features of the best-performing model. The CatBoost-based prediction model showed the best discriminatory power for high-risk patients and outperformed cardiovascular scores in the external validation set (area under the receiver operating characteristics curve [AUC], 0.867 [95% CI: 0.830-0.896]; revised cardiac index score, 0.528 [95% CI: 0.497-0.575; p < 0.000]; CHA

Indexed as

Machine LearningPostoperative ComplicationsStrokeAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPerioperative PeriodRetrospective StudiesRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsROC CurveMachine learningPerioperative strokeRisk stratification

Identifiers

PMID41258373
PMCPMC12630599

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.