ArticleScientific reports2025
A multi-distance laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy data classification method based on deep convolutional neural network and spectral sample weight optimization.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy (LIBS) is a stand-off chemical analysis technique. In scenarios where the LIBS detection distance varies (e.g. Mars exploration), the distance effect poses a significant challenge to data analysis. In our prior work, a deep convolutional neural network (CNN) model was developed to directly process LIBS multi-distance spectra, achieving high classification accuracy even without performing conventional "distance correction". The present study proposes a spectral sample weight optimization strategy to further improve the CNN model training process. Unlike the default equal-weight scheme, the new strategy tailors a specific weight value for every training spectral sample. On an eight-distance LIBS dataset acquired by the MarSCoDe duplicate instrument, the CNN model with the new weighting strategy can achieve a maximum testing accuracy of 92.06%, representing an improvement of 8.45 percentage points over our original CNN model. Besides accuracy, three other supplementary metrics also demonstrate the superiority of the new strategy: the precision, recall and F1-score can be averagely increased by 6.4, 7.0 and 8.2 percentage points, respectively. Moreover, the training time per epoch of the weight optimization strategy is almost identical to that of the original equal-weight scheme. These results indicate that the proposed methodology has great application potential in planetary exploration, and other LIBS-adopted scenarios involving varying detection distances.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.