ArticleScientific reports2025
YOLO11m-cls applied to sex and age classification based on the radiographic analysis of the nasal aperture.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Comparative Analysis of Third Molar Segmentation Performance Between Sexes Using Deep Learning Models.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Deep learning tools based on computer vision have emerged as alternative methods for assessing radiographic image patterns. These approaches have been explored for various forensic applications, including sex and age estimation. This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of a Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) in classifying radiographic images by sex and age, focusing on the nasal aperture as the morphological feature of interest. The sample comprised 9,349 radiographs annotated for the nasal aperture region. A CNN architecture based on the You Only Look Once series-specifically the intermediate version 11 for object classification (YOLO11m-cls)-was implemented, with training performed using 5-fold cross-validation. The overall accuracy rate was 74% (ranging from 61% to 88%), and the area under the Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve was 0.74. Correct classification rates were 73% for males and 75.17% for females. Accuracy varied with age, showing a 10% decrease among younger individuals compared to older ones. The study confirmed the reduced expression of sexually dimorphic traits in younger individuals and supported existing recommendations against performing sex estimation in subadults. Within the present methodological framework, the nasal aperture demonstrated limited applicability for sex estimation in the studied sample, with an accuracy rate corresponding to approximately one misclassification out of every four predictions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.