ArticlePharmacological reports : PR2026
Novel LC-MS/MS method for measuring methotrexate in high-dose therapy: a comparative study with commercial EMIT and EIA immunoassays.
Article in Pharmacological reports : PR, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Classification of intestinal inflammation driven by gut microbiota metabolites: a new paradigm for precision treatment of cardiovascular diseases.Frontiers in microbiology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMethotrexate (MTX) is a widely used chemotherapeutic agent in pediatric oncology, where high-dose protocols (HDMTX; ≥500 mg/m
methodsThe presented study aimed to compare the analytical performance of two immunoassays-enzyme-multiplied immunoassay technique (EMIT) and enzyme immunoassay (EIA)-against a newly developed and validated liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) method.
resultsThe LC-MS/MS assay demonstrated excellent linearity, sensitivity (LLOQ = 0.01 µmol/L), and precision, meeting ICH M10 regulatory guidelines. Clinical samples from pediatric patients receiving HDMTX were analyzed using all three methods. Results showed strong correlations (r > 0.93) between methods; however, immunoassays exhibited biases related to cross-reactivity with MTX metabolites such as DAMPA (2,4-diamino-N
conclusionsWhile immunoassays remain practical for routine monitoring due to their accessibility and speed, LC-MS/MS provides superior accuracy and should be the method of choice in critical clinical situations. These findings underscore the importance of selecting the appropriate assay to optimize HDMTX therapy and ensure patient safety.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.