Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41258318›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Abstract rule learning and generalization in human and nonhuman primates.

Angelle Antoun, Rohini Murugan, Benjamin Wilson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Angelle Antoun *Department of Psychology, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Rohini Murugan *Department of Psychology, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Benjamin WilsonDepartment of Psychology, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA. benjamin.wilson@emory.edu.

Funding

Yerkes National Primate Research Center Role of type-I IFN in regulating COVID-19 induced inflammation and pathogenesisP51OD011132 · OD · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI Joon Sup Lee · 2012 to 2026
$167.0M
NIH HHS P51 OD011132NIH Office of the Director P51OD011132
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

rules are central to human language, allowing for the generalization of grammatical rules to novel contexts. However, the evolutionary origin of the ability to learn and generalize these rules is unclear, and evidence for these capacities in nonhuman primates is equivocal. In a three-alternative forced-choice task, rhesus macaques and human participants learned to discriminate between sequences of trial-unique, colored stimuli based on three abstract rules ('ABA', 'AAB' or 'BAA'), demonstrating that, like humans, monkeys can learn and generalize abstract rules. However, follow-up testing demonstrated that unlike humans, monkeys learned slowly, showed limited cognitive flexibility in rule switching, and did not generalize across stimulus domains (from color to shape), suggesting that monkeys acquire more limited, context-specific representations. These results suggest that a critical open question regarding the uniqueness of human cognition is not only what animals are able to learn, but how they learn and represent abstract rules.

Indexed as

Generalization, PsychologicalLearningAdultAnimalsChoice BehaviorCognitionFemaleHumansMacaca mulattaMaleYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID41258318
PMCPMC12630658

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.