ArticleScientific reports2025
Abstract rule learning and generalization in human and nonhuman primates.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
rules are central to human language, allowing for the generalization of grammatical rules to novel contexts. However, the evolutionary origin of the ability to learn and generalize these rules is unclear, and evidence for these capacities in nonhuman primates is equivocal. In a three-alternative forced-choice task, rhesus macaques and human participants learned to discriminate between sequences of trial-unique, colored stimuli based on three abstract rules ('ABA', 'AAB' or 'BAA'), demonstrating that, like humans, monkeys can learn and generalize abstract rules. However, follow-up testing demonstrated that unlike humans, monkeys learned slowly, showed limited cognitive flexibility in rule switching, and did not generalize across stimulus domains (from color to shape), suggesting that monkeys acquire more limited, context-specific representations. These results suggest that a critical open question regarding the uniqueness of human cognition is not only what animals are able to learn, but how they learn and represent abstract rules.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.