ArticleScientific reports2025
Validation of a French version of the DERS-SF and creation of a super short form (DERS-F SSF) for measuring emotion regulation difficulties.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Validation of the Arabic Version of the Eight-Item Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale-8 (DERS-8) in Egypt.International journal of methods in psychiatric research · 2026Article
- Willingness to use video-game or gamified application-based interventions to improve or strengthen emotional regulation, mental health, and mental well-being.Internet interventions · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Difficulties in regulating emotions, i.e., struggling to manage emotions and pursuing goals despite emotions, is a predominant symptom in many diagnoses. In the general population, this variable can be measured with rather comprehensive questionnaires. This is the case of the Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale (DERS, 36 items), resulting in a total score and six different sub-scores. In most cases, however, the length and complexity of scale long versions compromise valid recordings. This is the reason why shorter versions of the DERS are available, such as the DERS-SF (18 items). However, when dealing with specific populations, and in particular clinical ones, 18 items remain burdensome. The creation of a Super Short Form seemed necessary in the field. With the present work, we aimed at, first, validating the French translation of the DERS-SF, a widely used instrument, which still lacks French validation. Second, based on an extensive database gathered in our lab, we propose a DERS Super-Short-Form composed of 6 items, each reflecting a difficulty in emotion regulation. Data of 3944 participants (76% female), who completed either the 36-item or the 18-item form of the French DERS were analyzed. Results support the validity and reliability of the French version of the DERS-SF (Cronbach α > 0.84 for the total score and congruence index, Tucker's ϕ > 0.99). The Super-Short Form demonstrated satisfactory reliability. External validity was confirmed, above and beyond what could be seen with longer scales, enriching the understanding of the various dimensions of the difficulties in emotion regulation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.