ArticleScientific reports2025
Prevalence and influencing factors of medical disputes in the field of neonatology: a cross-sectional survey in the mainland of China.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Neonatal pediatricians are facing relatively high risk of medical disputes since higher risk of mortality during the neonatal period caused by the increased number of premature births worldwide. However, there is little knowledge about the current status and distribution of medical disputes in Chinese neonatology. We conducted a cross-sectional survey to investigate the prevalence, potential causes, and associated risk factors of medical disputes in neonatology in the mainland of China. The statistical analysis was done by SPSS, including Chi-square test and independent samples t-test, Pearson correlation analysis and binary logistic regression analysis. Among the 12,118 participated neonatal pediatricians, 9,013 (74.4%) experienced medical disputes, and about 96% neonatal pediatricians older than 60 experienced medical disputes. A positive correlation was found between the prevalence of medical disputes and gross domestic product (GDP) per capita of the corresponding city or province. "Overestimation of treatment effects from the perspective of the patients and their families" was the primary cause of medical disputes. Gender, age, educational background, hospital level, and the number of responsible beds were independent risk factors contributing to medical disputes. Information obtained from this study may provide useful clues for reducing the occurrence of medical disputes in neonatology in the mainland of China.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.