Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41258279›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Comparing deep learning and Fourier series models for equipment failure prediction in predictive industrial maintenance 4.0.

Houria Abouloifa, Mohamed Bahaj

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Houria AbouloifaLab LMIET, Mathematics and Computer Science Department, Faculty of Sciences and Techniques, Hassan Ist University, Settat, Morocco. h.abouloifa@uhp.ac.ma.
Mohamed BahajLab LMIET, Mathematics and Computer Science Department, Faculty of Sciences and Techniques, Hassan Ist University, Settat, Morocco.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Current innovations in the field of smart manufacturing call for high machine availability, good product quality, and a high degree of flexibility in production processes. In addition to reducing downtime and increasing asset occupation, predictive maintenance also has the potential to improve safety and reduce maintenance costs by analyzing data to identify the root causes of equipment failures and prevent future occurrences. In this study, we develop a predictive maintenance model using both a Fourier series-based mathematical approach and a Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) deep learning algorithm, applied to synthetic multivariate sensor dataset representing industrial equipment behavior. The goal is to identify the most accurate method for forecasting machine failures and minimizing production interruptions. Our results demonstrate that the LSTM model outperforms the Fourier series model, achieving a lower MAE (0.0385), MSE (0.1085), and RMSE (0.3294), highlighting the superior performance of data-driven sequential learning in capturing failure dynamics. Statistical analysis using a paired t-test confirmed that the performance differences were statistically significant (p < 0.001), and 95% confidence intervals were reported. Additional residual visualizations further supported the conclusions.

Indexed as

Artificial intelligence (AI)Deep learningFourier seriesLSTM maintenance 4.0

Identifiers

PMID41258279
PMCPMC12630695

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.