ArticleScientific reports2025
Comparing deep learning and Fourier series models for equipment failure prediction in predictive industrial maintenance 4.0.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Current innovations in the field of smart manufacturing call for high machine availability, good product quality, and a high degree of flexibility in production processes. In addition to reducing downtime and increasing asset occupation, predictive maintenance also has the potential to improve safety and reduce maintenance costs by analyzing data to identify the root causes of equipment failures and prevent future occurrences. In this study, we develop a predictive maintenance model using both a Fourier series-based mathematical approach and a Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) deep learning algorithm, applied to synthetic multivariate sensor dataset representing industrial equipment behavior. The goal is to identify the most accurate method for forecasting machine failures and minimizing production interruptions. Our results demonstrate that the LSTM model outperforms the Fourier series model, achieving a lower MAE (0.0385), MSE (0.1085), and RMSE (0.3294), highlighting the superior performance of data-driven sequential learning in capturing failure dynamics. Statistical analysis using a paired t-test confirmed that the performance differences were statistically significant (p < 0.001), and 95% confidence intervals were reported. Additional residual visualizations further supported the conclusions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.