ArticleScientific reports2025
Machine learning-based prediction and SHAP sensitivity analysis of sound speed in hydrogen-rich gas mixtures.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The speed of sound is of particular importance in determining the physical and chemical properties of gas mixtures. Given the importance of this parameter in hydrogen transport and the high speed and accuracy of machine learning methods compared to traditional methods such as equations of state, this study estimates the speed of sound in hydrogen/cushion gas mixtures. For this purpose, 665 data sets of sound speed in hydrogen/cushion gas mixtures were collected from previous studies, and then 4 machine learning methods were used, including Linear Regression (LR), Extra Trees Regressor (ETR), Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), Support Vector Regression (SVR), and K-Nearest Neighbor (KNN). The hyperparameters of these models were optimized using the Bayesian algorithm, and fivefold cross-validation was used to prevent overfitting. The ETR method had the best performance with R
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.