ArticleScientific reports2025
A deep learning framework for objective aesthetic evaluation of indoor landscapes using CNN-GNN model.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Advanced Sensitive Feature Machine Learning for Aesthetic Evaluation Prediction of Industrial Products.Journal of imaging · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
With the rapid pace of modern urbanization, indoor landscape design has become increasingly important for enhancing the quality of indoor environments and overall user experience. Traditional aesthetic evaluation methods, which often rely on subjective human judgment, lack objectivity and efficiency. To address these limitations, this study proposes a deep learning-based framework for indoor landscape aesthetic evaluation. The proposed approach integrates convolutional neural networks (CNNs) and graph neural networks (GNNs) to extract and analyze both global and local aesthetic features from indoor landscape images. Experimental results on benchmark indoor landscape datasets demonstrate that our method achieves an accuracy of 97.74%, improving by 7.54% points compared to conventional approaches. In addition, the proposed model provides a 14.21% higher aesthetic score and a 10.6-point improvement in functional evaluation metrics. These findings highlight the potential of this CNN-GNN framework as a robust, objective, and efficient tool for indoor landscape aesthetic evaluation and design optimization.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.