ArticleScientific reports2025
Modulation of response inhibition with event-related atVNS showed EEG but no behavioral effects.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Response inhibition can be explained within the theory of event coding. Event file binding and reconfiguration have previously been studied in relation to various neurotransmitters. We aimed to activate the noradrenergic system through auricular transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation (atVNS) to study effects on response inhibition. Forty healthy participants completed a Go/Nogo task under verum and sham phasic event-related atVNS stimulation with concomitant EEG measurement. The Go/Nogo task was designed to assess response inhibition with feature overlap between Go and Nogo trials requiring reconfiguration of event files. In overlapping Go trials, reaction times increased, and accuracy decreased compared to non-overlapping trials. False alarm rates were higher in overlapping Nogo trials. There were no influences of atVNS on behavioral data. Using multivariate pattern analysis, EEG data showed sustained and robust differences in classification between verum and sham stimulation across trial types. Off-diagonal activity was consistently observed in time generalization matrices between 100 and 900ms for overlapping Go and Nogo conditions, as well as for non-overlapping Go conditions and until approximately 750ms for non-overlapping Nogo conditions. There were no trial-specific effects of phasic atVNS, it affected all trials in the verum condition. In conclusion, this study demonstrates that short-lasting, event-related atVNS has an effect on EEG activities, but not on behavioral outcomes during a Go/Nogo task that requires event-file reconfiguration. As EEG changes were detected also in non-stimulated trials, there may be effects of the short-duration atVNS outlasting the period of stimulation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.