ArticleSchizophrenia (Heidelberg, Germany)2025
Spontaneous head movements during virtual clinical interviews help predict 12-months clinical outcomes in youth at clinical high risk for psychosis.
Article in Schizophrenia (Heidelberg, Germany), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- The effect of monetary versus point-based rewards on effort-cost decision making in individuals at clinical high risk for psychosis.Schizophrenia research · 2026Trial
- Reduced interpersonal head synchrony in youth at clinical high risk for psychosis.Psychological medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Identifying predictors of clinical and functioning outcomes in individuals at clinical high risk (CHR) for psychosis is essential to early intervention and symptom monitoring. While motor abnormalities have been established as core features of psychosis vulnerability, the prognostic value of social motor behavior, particularly head movements during social interactions, remains underexplored despite being readily accessible and measurable by clinicians. We analyzed 10-minute of video recordings from virtual clinical interviews involving 72 individuals at CHR using an open-access video-based head tracking tool to quantify spontaneous head movements. In a longitudinal study, we examined associations between head movements, symptom severity, and global functioning at baseline and 12-month follow-up. At baseline, results showed that total amount of head movements were positively correlated with positive symptoms (ρ = 0.37), negative symptoms (ρ = 0.28), particularly social anhedonia (ρ = 0.30) and avolition (ρ = 0.31), and social functioning (ρ = -0.33). Head movements at baseline also predicted worsening of avolition (R
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.