Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41258205›Full record

SynthesisEuropean journal of pediatrics2025

Economic evidence on the cost-effectiveness of newborn screening for spinal muscular atrophy: a systematic review.

Amit Kumar Mittal, Mamta Patel, Prachi Sharma, Dolat Singh Shekhawat, Priya Amrit, Lokesh Saini, Kuldeep Singh

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in European journal of pediatrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Amit Kumar Mittal *Resource Centre Health Technology Assessment, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Jodhpur, India.
Mamta Patel *Resource Centre Health Technology Assessment, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Jodhpur, India.
Prachi SharmaResource Centre Health Technology Assessment, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Jodhpur, India.
Dolat Singh ShekhawatDept. of Medical Genetics, NIDAN Kendra, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Jodhpur, India.
Priya AmritResource Centre Health Technology Assessment, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Jodhpur, India.
Lokesh SainiDepartment of Paediatrics, All India Institute of Medical Sciences Jodhpur, Basni-2, Jodhpur, Rajasthan, 342005, India.
Kuldeep SinghResource Centre Health Technology Assessment, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Jodhpur, India. kulpra@gmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) is a severe neurodegenerative disorder associated with the risk of early infantile death. Newborn screening (NBS) is a vital public health strategy that enables early diagnosis and intervention. Economic evaluations have become essential to support the adoption of NBS programs for SMA. This systematic review aimed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of NBS across different countries and healthcare settings for SMA. The PubMed, ScienceDirect, and Scopus databases were searched for cost-effectiveness studies of the NBS for SMA from January 2000 to June 2025. A standardized data extraction form was used to collect relevant data, including characteristics, perspectives, economic evaluations, and outcomes. A total of six studies met the predefined inclusion criteria, and all of them reported cost-utility analysis. All studies were economic model-based evaluations. These studies indicated that NBS for SMA is highly likely to demonstrate healthcare and societal cost-effectiveness. All six studies reported favorable economic outcomes, presenting either incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) or life-year gained, cost per QALY, or total cost savings. Collectively, these findings demonstrated that NBS for SMA is consistently cost-effective across diverse settings. The systematic review supports the inclusion of this approach in national screening programs as a cost-effective and life-saving public health strategy for SMA.

conclusionThese studies indicated that NBS for SMA is highly likely to demonstrate healthcare and societal cost-effectiveness. All six studies reported favorable economic outcomes, presenting either incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) or life-year gained, cost per QALY, or total cost savings. Collectively, these findings demonstrated that NBS for SMA is consistently cost-effective across diverse settings. The systematic review supports the inclusion of this approach in national screening programs as a cost-effective and life-saving public health strategy for SMA.

trial registrationPROSPERO (CRD42024608296). WHAT IS KNOWN: •SMA is a genetic neurodegenerative disorder causing progressive muscle weakness and early infant death if untreated. •Early detection through NBS enables timely intervention, significantly improving survival and quality of life. WHAT IS NEW: •The reviewed literature consistently demonstrates favorable economic outcomes, with most studies reporting either a cost-saving effect or acceptable ICERs per QALY gained. •These findings support the inclusion of SMA in national NBS programs, as early detection enables timely treatment, resulting in improved health outcomes and reduced long-term healthcare costs.

Indexed as

Cost-Benefit AnalysisMuscular Atrophy, SpinalNeonatal ScreeningHumansInfant, NewbornQuality-Adjusted Life YearsCost-effectivenessDiagnosisNewborn screeningSpinal muscular atrophy (SMA)Systematic review

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.