Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41258183›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Optimal structure of signal networks for efficient information aggregation.

Bernd Heidergott, Frank den Hollander, Ines Lindner, Azadeh Parvaneh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Bernd HeidergottDepartment of Operations Analytics, VU University Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1105, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Frank den HollanderMathematical Institute, Leiden University, Einsteinweg 55, 2333 CC, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Ines LindnerDepartment of Economics, VU University Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1105, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. i.d.lindner@vu.nl.
Azadeh ParvanehMathematical Institute, Leiden University, Einsteinweg 55, 2333 CC, Leiden, The Netherlands.

Funding

Horizon 2020 Framework Programme 101034253Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek 024.002.003
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This paper develops a mathematical framework to study signal networks, in which nodes can be active or inactive, and their activation or deactivation is driven by external signals and the states of the nodes to which they are connected via links. The focus is on determining the optimal number of key nodes (= highly connected and structurally important nodes) required to represent the global activation state of the network accurately. Motivated by neuroscience, medical science, and social science examples, we describe the node dynamics as a continuous-time inhomogeneous Markov process. Under mean-field and homogeneity assumptions, appropriate for large scale-free and disassortative signal networks, we derive differential equations characterising the global activation behaviour and compute the expected hitting time to network triggering. Analytical and numerical results show that two or three key nodes are typically sufficient to approximate the overall network state well, balancing sensitivity and robustness. Our findings provide insight into how natural systems can efficiently aggregate information by exploiting minimal structural components.

Indexed as

Active versus inactive nodesAggregated nodesKey nodesSignal networkTriggering

Identifiers

PMID41258183
PMCPMC12630627

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.