ArticleScientific reports2025
Analytical and clinical validation of step counting method in people living with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparison of Consumer Smartwatch and Research-Grade Accelerometer-Derived Step Counts in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis.Muscle & nerve · 2026Observational
- [Personalized lower-limb gait assessment method based on musculoskeletal modeling and machine learning].Sheng wu yi xue gong cheng xue za zhi = Journal of biomedical engineering = Shengwu yixue gongchengxue zazhi · 2026Article
- Digital Remote Assessment of Motor and Speech Changes in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis: Longitudinal Observational Study.JMIR formative research · 2026Observational
- Intrathecal (GActa neuropathologica communications · 2026Article
- Intrathecal (GbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Accelerometer-based digital measures offer a scalable and low-burden means of quantifying physical function, but existing processing algorithms may not quantify pathological gait correctly. In people living with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), where gait patterns are slow, variable, and asymmetric, validated tools to quantify mobility are urgently needed. We proposed a step-counting algorithm designed for ankle-worn accelerometers that leverage wavelet-based decomposition to quantify heel strikes under heterogeneous gait patterns. We validated this method using five datasets comprising healthy individuals and those with ALS in controlled and semi-controlled activities, and we performed clinical validation in a free-living cohort of 305 people with ALS. We tested our method for accuracy in detecting steps and recognizing walking activity. Reference labels used for analytical validation were obtained from annotated studies or video-based ground truth. Step counting accuracy was assessed using Bland-Altman analysis while clinical validity was evaluated by comparing step counts to gross motor functioning on the ALS Functional Rating Scale-Revised (ALSFRS-R). Walking recognition was robust across walking conditions and body types; sensitivity ranged from 0.94 to 0.98, and specificity exceeded 0.95 across all evaluated datasets. The mean step counting bias was minimal (e.g., 0.44 steps), and the 95% limits of agreement were narrow (LoA = [-5.90, 5.40]) relative to reference standards, including video-annotated ground truth. Clinical validation indicated substantial differences between groups with various levels of gait impairment, e.g., participants who reported "walks with assist" on the ALSFRS-R accumulated a mean of 1283 (95% CI 1063, 1503) steps/day, while those reporting "normal" walking covered 3984 (95% CI 3537, 4432) steps/day. Our study covered analytical and clinical validation of a step-counting method developed for ankle-worn accelerometers and demonstrated its applicability to pathological gait. The method provides accurate quantification of walking activity in controlled and free-living environments, supporting its use as a digital endpoint in ALS research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.