ArticleScientific reports2025
Analysis of the efficacy and safety of denosumab in the treatment of patients with osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures after PVP.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The overall purpose of this study was to explore the efficacy of denosumab in the treatment of osteoporotic vertebral fractures and to compare the efficacy of denosumab in osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture (OVCF) patients with or without a history of osteoporotic fractures. We included 70 patients with single-segment OVCFs who underwent percutaneous vertebral plasty (PVP) at our hospital between October 2020 and April 2022. All postoperative patients received one year of anti-osteoporosis treatment, adopting conventional basic treatment methods such as oral calcium and vitamin D supplements, with subcutaneous injections of denosumab at 60 mg/time every six months (for a total of two times). Patients were grouped on the basis of whether they had previously experienced osteoporotic fractures, and changes in bone mineral density (BMD) of the lumbar spine and hip before and one year after treatment were recorded. Additionally, changes in the preoperative visual analogue scale (VAS) score for back pain and the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) were observed, as were adverse drug reaction and recurrent fracture incidences. Anterior and posterior vertebral height and sagittal Cobb angle changes were measured on anteroposterior and lateral X-ray films before and after treatment. The results revealed that one year after denosumab treatment, the BMD values at all sites were significantly greater in the 70 patients than before treatment (P < 0.05). Both the group with a history of osteoporotic fractures and the group without a history of osteoporotic fractures (predominantly OVCFs) showed improvements in BMD at various sites. Furthermore, compared with a history of osteoporotic fractures, denosumab was more effective at improving the BMD of patients with their first osteoporotic fracture.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.