Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41258137›Full record

ArticleOsteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA2026

Treatment patterns of romosozumab in postmenopausal women with severe osteoporosis in Denmark: findings from the ROmosozumab in Scandinavia real-world Evidence Study (ROSES).

Bente L Langdahl, Mattias Lorentzon, Tove T Borgen, Estelle Bajtner, Tanja Kaarill, Cecilie Alstad, Alexander Rieem Dun, Mie Sisse Konradsen, Johan Liseth Hansen, Oskar Ström and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Bente L LangdahlDepartment of Endocrinology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark. bente.langdahl@aarhus.rm.dk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8712-7199
Mattias LorentzonDepartment of Internal Medicine and Clinical Nutrition, Institute of Medicine, Sahlgrenska Osteoporosis Centre, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Tove T BorgenDepartment of Rheumatology, Drammen Hospital, Vestre Viken Hospital Trust, Drammen, Norway.
Estelle BajtnerUCB, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Tanja KaarillUCB, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Cecilie AlstadUCB, Oslo, Norway.
Alexander Rieem DunQuantify Research, Stockholm, Sweden.
Mie Sisse KonradsenQuantify Research, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Johan Liseth HansenQuantify Research, Stockholm, Sweden.
Oskar StrömQuantify Research, Stockholm, Sweden.
Evangelos TsitlakidisUCB, Oslo, Norway.
Alireza MoayyeriUCB, Slough, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo describe patient and prescriber characteristics and factors associated with utilization of romosozumab in Denmark.

methodsThis registry‑based Danish retrospective cohort study comprised females aged ≥ 50 receiving osteoporosis medication from September 2020 - October 2023. Three cohorts were identified: those treated with romosozumab (cohort 1), those with osteoporosis‑related fracture within the last three years treated with other osteoporosis medications (cohort 2), and those without osteoporosis‑related fracture within three years prior to initiating other osteoporosis medications (cohort 3). Patient and prescriber characteristics are presented by cohort. Factors associated with receiving romosozumab and transition of treatment are reported.

resultsOverall, 149,395 patients were included. Cohort 1 (n = 622) was younger, had lower proportions of comorbidities and use of glucocorticoids than cohorts 2 (n = 29,021) and 3 (n = 119,752). In cohort 1, 277 patients (44.5%) were osteoporosis treatment‑naïve and the majority received their index treatment from secondary endocrinological care. The median duration from romosozumab initiation to a recorded treatment transition was 350 days; most patients transitioned between 11-15 months to zoledronate (53.5%), alendronate (18.9%), or denosumab (13.5%).

conclusionThis study provides real-world insight into patient and prescriber characteristics, and patterns and factors of romosozumab use across Denmark. Whilst a notable proportion of patients received romosozumab first in sequential therapy, there is still opportunity to optimize bone mineral density (BMD) outcomes with osteoanabolic agents used first, followed by an antiresorptive, in patients at high fracture risk. Of romosozumab-treated patients with 15 months follow-up data, most were assumed to continue romosozumab for 11-15 months when treatment transition was recorded. Real-world data from Danish registries were used to describe treatment patterns with romosozumab and other anti-osteoporosis treatments in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. The study found romosozumab‑treated patients were younger and had fewer comorbidities than other osteoporosis patients. Among romosozumab-treated patients, 44.5% were treatment-naïve and most continued with romosozumab for 11-15 months.

Indexed as

Antibodies, MonoclonalBone Density Conservation AgentsOsteoporosis, PostmenopausalPractice Patterns, Physicians'AgedAged, 80 and overBone DensityDenmarkFemaleHumansMiddle AgedOsteoporotic FracturesRegistriesRetrospective StudiesAntibodies, MonoclonalBone Density Conservation AgentsromosozumabDenmarkOsteoporosisPostmenopausal womenReal-world evidenceRetrospective cohort studyRomosozumab

Identifiers

PMID41258137
PMCPMC12847144

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.