ArticleNPJ digital medicine2025
Interpretable Multiomics Models for Predicting Surgical Interventions and Blood Transfusion Requirements in Traumatic Brain Injury.
Article in NPJ digital medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Accurately predicting surgical and transfusion needs in traumatic brain injury (TBI) patients remains challenging in emergency settings. We developed multiomics data fusion (MDF) models integrating clinical biomarkers, neural radiological imaging, and clinical text mining for predicting surgical intervention and blood transfusion requirements across four multicenter cohorts (N = 2219). The MDF models provided predictions a median of 3 hours before interventions, with surgical model F1 scores of 0.63-0.85 across external testing, outperforming single-domain approaches. The transfusion model demonstrated strong cross-center performance (validation/external F1 scores: 0.78, 0.74) and correlated well with actual transfusion volumes (validation: R = 0.687, external: R = 0.580). SHapley additive exPlanations revealed radiological features drove surgical predictions, while clinical parameters (lactate, GCS scores, pupillary reflex, and hemoglobin) were crucial for transfusion predictions. We also developed a simplified emergency model maintaining robust performance (validation AUC: 0.81, external AUC: 0.75). These models demonstrate cross-center generalizability and practical utility for emergency settings, supporting clinical implementation for improved TBI patient management.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.