ArticleScientific reports2025
Recognition model for counterfeit protection system in colour-laser-printed documents based on improved ShuffleNet V2.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Counterfeit Protection System (CPS) examination is as a crucial method for both brand discrimination and individual identification of colour laser printers. Current CPS recognition methodologies for colour-laser-printed documents primarily rely on manual inspection, leading to low efficiency and suboptimal accuracy. To address this limitation, this study developed an improved ShuffleNet_OD_CA model based on the lightweight convolutional neural network ShuffleNet V2 to enhance CPS recognition across different printer brands. Utilising printed documents from eight dominant colour laser printer brands (collectively representing over 95% of the market share), a dedicated dataset was constructed. This dataset was used to train the proposed CPS recognition model for colour-laser-printed documents, followed by comprehensive testing. The enhanced ShuffleNet_OD_CA model effectively identified CPS patterns in colour-laser-printed documents, achieving a recognition accuracy of 91.18% on the test set. The model exhibited 1.82 million parameters and 80.3 million FLOPs, which were fewer than those of the baseline (pre-improvement) model. Furthermore, compared to classical network models such as ResNet, the improved ShuffleNet_OD_CA model not only achieved higher recognition accuracy but also requires fewer parameters. This analysis demonstrated the capability of the model to extract and analyse key image features of the CPS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.