Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41258103›Full record

ArticleCellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS2025

Myogenic enhancer snatching promotes adipogenic differentiation during epigenetic reprogramming mediated by lineage-specific transcription factors.

Mingyang Hu, Zhixiang Xu, Jiahao Sun, Linmi Li, Pengxuan Liu, Honghong Zhou, Xiaolong Qi, Weike Ren, Yujia Liu, Shuya Chen and 8 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Mingyang Hu *Yazhouwan National Laboratory, Sanya, 572000, China.
Zhixiang Xu *Key Lab of Agricultural Animal Genetics, Breeding and Reproduction of Ministry of Education and Key Laboratory of Swine Genetics and Breeding of Ministry of Agriculture, College of Animal Science and Technology, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, 430070, China.
Jiahao Sun *Key Lab of Agricultural Animal Genetics, Breeding and Reproduction of Ministry of Education and Key Laboratory of Swine Genetics and Breeding of Ministry of Agriculture, College of Animal Science and Technology, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, 430070, China.
Linmi LiKey Lab of Agricultural Animal Genetics, Breeding and Reproduction of Ministry of Education and Key Laboratory of Swine Genetics and Breeding of Ministry of Agriculture, College of Animal Science and Technology, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, 430070, China.
Pengxuan LiuCollege of Biomedicine and Health, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, 430070, China.
Honghong ZhouYazhouwan National Laboratory, Sanya, 572000, China.
Xiaolong QiYazhouwan National Laboratory, Sanya, 572000, China.
Weike RenCollege of Biomedicine and Health, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, 430070, China.
Yujia LiuCollege of Biomedicine and Health, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, 430070, China.
Shuya ChenCollege of Biomedicine and Health, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, 430070, China.
Renzhuo KuangKey Lab of Agricultural Animal Genetics, Breeding and Reproduction of Ministry of Education and Key Laboratory of Swine Genetics and Breeding of Ministry of Agriculture, College of Animal Science and Technology, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, 430070, China.
Daoyuan WangKey Lab of Agricultural Animal Genetics, Breeding and Reproduction of Ministry of Education and Key Laboratory of Swine Genetics and Breeding of Ministry of Agriculture, College of Animal Science and Technology, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, 430070, China.
Yaping GuoKey Lab of Agricultural Animal Genetics, Breeding and Reproduction of Ministry of Education and Key Laboratory of Swine Genetics and Breeding of Ministry of Agriculture, College of Animal Science and Technology, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, 430070, China.
Ge SunHainan Research Institute of Huazhong Agricultural University, Sanya, 572000, China.
Shuhong ZhaoKey Lab of Agricultural Animal Genetics, Breeding and Reproduction of Ministry of Education and Key Laboratory of Swine Genetics and Breeding of Ministry of Agriculture, College of Animal Science and Technology, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, 430070, China.
Mengjin ZhuKey Lab of Agricultural Animal Genetics, Breeding and Reproduction of Ministry of Education and Key Laboratory of Swine Genetics and Breeding of Ministry of Agriculture, College of Animal Science and Technology, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, 430070, China. zhumengjin@mail.hzau.edu.cn.
Li LiCollege of Biomedicine and Health, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, 430070, China. l.li@mail.hzau.edu.cn.
Yunxia ZhaoKey Lab of Agricultural Animal Genetics, Breeding and Reproduction of Ministry of Education and Key Laboratory of Swine Genetics and Breeding of Ministry of Agriculture, College of Animal Science and Technology, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, 430070, China. yxzhao@mail.hzau.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2253-2484

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 31961143020National Natural Science Foundation of China 32341051Science Fund for Creative Research Groups of the National Natural Science Foundation of China 32221005
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The myoblast-to-adipocyte trans-differentiation model is crucial for studying the regulatory mechanisms underlying ectopic fat deposition and cell fate determination. However, the comprehensive dynamics of chromatin accessibility and interactions during this process remain largely unexplored. To address this, we performed an integrative analysis of bulk and single-cell multi-omics data (ATAC-seq, RNA-seq), and Hi-C data on an adipogenesis model in C2C12 myoblasts. Our findings revealed significant reprogramming of chromatin accessibility driven by adipogenic lineage-specific transcription factors (TFs), particularly Cebps and Stats, during trans-differentiation. Notably, 63.46% of the distal open chromatin regions with increased accessibility were shared between myogenesis and adipogenesis. Further joint analysis with Hi-C data suggests that these pre-established enhancers in myoblasts undergo a "regulatory redirection," shifting their influence from myogenic to adipogenic genes-a phenomenon we termed "enhancer snatch." This model was validated by knocking out a "snatched" enhancer (Enhancer-R/L), which was found to be a critical regulator of both Rbl1 and Lbp expression. Overall, our study uncovers a mechanism that pre-established enhancers in original cell lineage are predominantly utilized by lineage-specific TFs during chromatin reprogramming, thereby altering cell's differentiation trajectory.

Indexed as

AdipogenesisCellular ReprogrammingEnhancer Elements, GeneticEpigenesis, GeneticMuscle DevelopmentTranscription FactorsAdipocytesAnimalsCell DifferentiationCell LineCell LineageChromatinMiceMyoblastsChromatinTranscription FactorsCell fateChromatin interactionsEnhancer snatchTrans-differentiation

Identifiers

PMID41258103
PMCPMC12630441

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.